CBCA 6300
Board: CBCA
Agency: General Services Administration
Appellant: B.L. Harbert International, LLC
Date: 2019-05-13
Outcome: dismissed
ISSUED WITHOUT REDACTION: May 20, 2019
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM: May 13, 2019
CBCA 6300, 6301
B.L. HARBERT INTERNATIONAL, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Thomas B. Drohan of Drohan, Hitt & Hadas LLC, Boston, MA, counsel for
Appellant.
Catherine Crow and Kelly Y. Burnell, Office of General Counsel, General Services
Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges VERGILIO, ZISCHKAU, and SULLIVAN.
VERGILIO, Board Judge.
B.L. Harbert International, LLC (contractor), disputes two decisions of a contracting
officer with the General Services Administration (agency), denying claims for additional
money ($83,062 in CBCA 6300; $47,486 in CBCA 6301) said to arise from a change when
the agency did not permit the contractor to utilize manufacturers of its choosing that differ
from those specified in the contract. The agency has moved to dismiss the cases for failure
to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, Board Rule 8(e), on the theory that no
change occurred because, for the items at issue, the contractor was not entitled to substitute
a product by a manufacturer of its own selection that was not named in the contract. The
contractor has filed submissions in opposition.
CBCA 6300, 6301 2
The Board resolves the motion by examining the complaint and the referenced claims
and contract. The Board concludes that the contractor cannot obtain relief on its claims
because the contract does not entitle the contractor to substitute the products it wanted. The
Board grants the agencyâs motion and dismisses the appeals.
Background
1. The parties entered into a contract requiring the contractor to construct a
building. Two items to be installed in the project are at issue here. The contract
specifications name one manufacturer and product for one item, and list three manufacturers
(one identified as the basis for design) for the other item. Complaint at 2 (¶ 2).
2. The product requirements section of the contract, division 1, § 01 6000, details
requirements for product selection, including:
Product: Where Specifications name a single manufacturer and product,
provide the named product that complies with requirements. Comparable
products or substitutions for Contractorâs convenience will not be considered.
Exhibit 3 at 355, 359. And, regarding manufacturers:
Restricted List: Where Specifications include a list of manufacturersâ names,
provide a product by one of the manufacturers listed that complies with
requirements. Comparable products or substitutions for Contractorâs
convenience will not be considered.
Exhibit 3 at 359. Further, for a basis of design product:
Where Specifications name a product, or refer to a product indicated on
Drawings, and include a list of manufacturers, provide the specified or
indicated product or a comparable product by one of the other named
manufacturers.
Exhibit 3 at 359. The substitution procedures section of the contract, § 01 2500, contains
procedures for the contractor to make substitutions, but also recognizes that other provisions
identify specific requirements and limitations for substitutions. The section specifies that the
division 1 requirements, which include those quoted above, identify requirements for
submitting comparable product submittals for products by listed manufacturers. Other
portions of the contract detail other procedures. Exhibit 3 at 175-78; Complaint at 5 (¶ 18).
CBCA 6300, 6301 3
3. The contractor references, without objection, a Materials and Workmanship
(APR 1984) clause, 48 CFR 52.236-5 (2018), as part of the contract. It provides:
References in the specifications to equipment, material, articles, or patented
processes by trade name, make or catalog number, shall be regarded as
establishing a standard of quality and shall not be construed as limiting
competition. The Contractor may, at its option, use any equipment, material,
article, or process that, in the judgment of the Contracting Officer, is equal to
that named in the specifications, unless otherwise specifically provided in this
contract.
(Emphasis added). The contractor also relies upon the Changes clause, 48 CFR 52.243-4,
which it states, without objection, is part of the contract. Complaint at 4 (¶ 14).
4.