CBCA 5955
Board: CBCA
Agency: Department of Transportation
Appellant: Eagle Peak Rock & Paving, Inc.
Date: 2022-04-08
Outcome: dismissed
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION: April 8, 2022
CBCA 5955
EAGLE PEAK ROCK & PAVING, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
Bennett J. Lee and Stephen L. Pessagno of Varela, Lee, Metz & Guarino, LLP, San
Francisco, CA; and David B. Wonderlick of Varela, Lee, Metz & Guarino, LLP, Tysons
Corner, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Rayann L. Speakman, Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Highway Administration,
Department of Transportation, Vancouver, WA; and Milton Hsieh, Office of the Chief
Counsel, Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation, Sterling, VA,
counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges RUSSELL, KULLBERG, and SULLIVAN.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
This appeal arises from a contract entered into between Eagle Peak Rock & Paving,
Inc. (Eagle Peak) and the Department of Transportationâs Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) for construction work in Yellowstone National Park. Eagle Peak challenges
FHWAâs withholding of payments for the companyâs alleged failure to timely submit a work
schedule pursuant to 48 CFR 52.236-15 (2016). Although FHWA did not contest the
Boardâs jurisdiction to entertain this appeal, the Board raised the issue, sua sponte, and asked
CBCA 5955 2
the parties to brief the issue of jurisdiction. Based on the briefing and evidence produced by
the parties, we find that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal.1
Background
Eagle Peak filed its notice of appeal with the Board on December 1, 2017. In its
notice of appeal and in its complaint, Eagle Peak stated that it received the contracting
officerâs decision serving as the basis for this appeal on September 5, 2017. FHWA, in its
answer to appellantâs complaint, however, stated that the contracting officerâs decision was
delivered to Eagle Peak via Federal Express (FedEx) on September 1, 2017.
FHWA produced a FedEx receipt with a timestamp indicating that the package
containing the contracting officerâs final decision was delivered at 2:35 p.m. on September
1, 2017, to the address identified in the contract as the location of Eagle Peakâs offices. The
receipt was signed by an individual identified by Eagle Peak as a receptionist in its office.
Anthony Cruse, Eagle Peakâs president, provided two declarations. Mr. Cruse
asserted that Eagle Peak received the contracting officerâs decision on September 5, 2017,
which was the Tuesday after the Labor Day holiday. Declaration of Anthony Cruse ¶ 3
(Dec. 29, 2020). He explained that, â[i]n September 2017, Eagle Peak employed . . . a
receptionistâ whose âregular duties did not include the receipt or distribution of
correspondence or packages addressed to Eagle Peak.â Supplemental Declaration of
Anthony Cruse ¶ 2 (April 27, 2021). Mr. Cruse noted that Eagle Peakâs general manager at
the time handled such duties. Id. ¶ 3. Specifically, the general manager received, signed for,
and distributed packages at Eagle Peakâs physical office. Id. Mr. Cruse further stated:
[T]he Eagle Peak office to which the [contracting officerâs] letter was
addressed was closed September 4, 2017 in observance of Labor Day. That
office likely was closed the preceding workday, September 1, 2017, as the
California Department of Transportation projects which Eagle Peak managed
from that office during that time typically prohibited project work both on
Labor Day and the workday preceding Labor Day. Thus, [the receptionist]
1
In December 2018, the Board conducted a ten-day hearing in CBCA 5692, in
which Eagle Peak challenged FHWAâs termination of their construction contract for default.
While the parties presented evidence in this appeal (CBCA 5955) at the hearing, the Board
deferred a determination on the merits in this appeal and requested that the parties brief the
issue of the Boardâs jurisdiction. By decision dated December 7, 2020, the Board granted
Eagle Peakâs appeal in CBCA 5692. See Eagle Peak Rock & Paving, Inc. v. Department of
Transportation, CBCA 5692, 21-1 BCA ¶ 37,752 (2020), appeal docketed, No. 21-1837
(Fed. Cir. April 8, 2021).
CBCA 5955 3
likely was the only Eagle Peak employee physically present at that office on
September 1, 2017 for the purpose of answering calls.
Id.