ASBCA 58167
Board: ASBCA
Date: 2013-05-06
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of ~ )
)
Tri-County Contractors, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 5 8167
)
Under Contract No. N69450-10-C-3597 )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Precious T. Martin, Sr., Esq.
Precious Martin, Sr. & Associates, PLLC
Jackson, MS
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Ronald J. Borro, Esq.
Navy Chief Trial Attorney
Pamela J. Nestell, Esq.
Senior Trial Attorney
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE JAMES ON
RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
On 6 June 2012 Tri-County Contractors, Inc. (Tri-County) appealed from the
contracting officer's (CO) 30 May 2012 letter denying all aspects of Tri-County's
$242,830 claim under the captioned contract. The Board's decision of 13 November
2012, Tri-County Contractors, Inc., ASBCA No. 58167, 12-2 BCA \ 35,184, denied the
government's motion to dismiss for lack ofjurisdiction. The Board has jurisdiction of
the appeal under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109. On
7 February 2013 respondent moved for summary judgment based on release and final
payment. Tri-County responded to the motion on 12 March 2013. Respondent replied
thereto on 29 March 2013.
STATEMENT OF FACTS (SOF) FOR PURPOSES OF THE MOTION
1. On 20 July 2010 NAVFAC (Naval Facilities Engineering Command),
Southeast, Naval Construction Battalion Center (NCBC), Gulfport, Mississippi, and
Tri-County entered into Contract No. N69450-10-C-3597 (the contract) to replace NCBC
Building 400's oil and lubricating system for the firm fixed-price of $618,304.00 (R4, tab
1 at 1-2, 4, 191).
2. The contract's Standard Form 1442 SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD,
Block 29, designated "the Government solicitation" (No. N69450-10-R-5093) as part of
All Rule 4 page number citations are to Bates numbers.
the contract. That solicitation incorporated by reference the FAR 52.232-5, Payments
under Fixed-Price Construction Contracts (Sep 2002) clause, which provided in
pertinent part:
(h) Final payment. The Government shall pay the amount
due the Contractor under this contract afterâ
(1) Completion and acceptance of all work;
(2) Presentation of a properly executed voucher; and
(3) Presentation of release of all claims against the
Government arising by virtue of this contract, other than
claims, in stated amounts, that the Contractor has
specifically excepted from the operation of the release.
The contract also incorporated by reference the DFARS 252.243-7002, REQUESTS FOR
Equitable Adjustment (Mar 1998) clause (R4, tab 1 at 20); it did not incorporate the
FAR 52.243-4, CHANGES (Jun 2007) clause required by FAR 43.205(d)(2) for inclusion
in construction contracts exceeding the $100,000 simplified acquisition threshold.
3. On or about 25 February 2011 Tri-County sent a letter to NCBC titled
"Equitable Adjustment: Request for Contracting Officer's Final Decision" seeking
$156,150.80, including direct material cost and state taxes, and 49 days delay with
respect to underground double wall piping, which included a DFARS 252.243-7002
certification that stated: "I certify that the request is made in good faith, and that the
supporting data are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief," but
included no CDA certification (R4, tab 6 at 207-11).
4. The 27 June 2011 letter of Renee M. Comfort, NAVFAC Southeast Chief of
Contracts, acknowledged receipt on 22 April 2011 of Tri-County's $156,150.80 "claim"
(app. supp. R4, tab 1).
5. Ms. Comfort's 24 October 2011 letter, Ser. ACQ/008, to NCBC forwarded
Tri-County's claim received 22 April 2011 about ambiguous double walled piping and
stated that on her review, "the contractor's position is found to have merit" (R4, tab 8).
Her undated letter, Ser. ACQ/009, on or about 24 October 2011, advised Tri-County "that
your claim has some merit" and that the claim was "remanded to PWD [Public Works
Department] Gulfport to facilitate negotiations regarding the appropriate price adjustment
associated with the specification ambiguity" (R4, tab 7).
2 Respondent sent Solicitation No. N69450-10-R-5093 to the Board on 17 April 2013.
6. Tri-County's 8 November 2011 email to Mr.