CBCA 4026
Board: CBCA
Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
Appellant: Valerie Lewis Janitorial
Date: 2020-05-05
Outcome: remanded
THIS OPINION WAS INITIALLY ISSUED UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER AND
IS BEING RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC IN ITS ENTIRETY ON MAY 12, 2020
GRANTED IN PART: May 5, 2020
CBCA 4026
VALERIE LEWIS JANITORIAL,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Theodore P. Watson of Watson & Associates, LLC, Aurora, CO, counsel for
Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges DRUMMOND, KULLBERG, and OâROURKE.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
Appellant, Valerie Lewis Janitorial (VLJ), timely appealed the contracting officerâs
final decision (COFD) that denied its two certified claims and asserted two counterclaims
related to VLJâs contract with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for custodial and
aseptic cleaning services. In its first claim, VLJ sought to recover $272,751.03 for the
increased cost of using a two-step process of aseptic cleaning. In its second claim, VLJ
sought to recover $441,138.06 for the cost of the increased frequency of cleaning certain
buildings. The counterclaims included a claim in the amount of $112,682.12 for the use of
CBCA 4026 2
the VAâs mops and laundry services, and a claim in the amount of $56,924.20 for the cost
of janitorial services for two buildings after VLJ stopped cleaning those buildings. A
three-day hearing of the appeal was held at the Board, and the parties submitted briefs and
reply briefs. Only entitlement is at issue. Board Order (Aug. 7, 2014).
As discussed below, the Board grants the appeal in part. The Board finds entitlement
with regard to VLJâs implementation of the two-step aseptic cleaning process at the VAâs
direction. The Board denies VLJâs claim for increased frequency of cleaning. Additionally,
the Board denies the VAâs two counterclaims.
Background
Solicitation
On or about September 5, 2008, the VA issued solicitation VA-261-08-UP-0083
(solicitation). Appeal File, Exhibit 3 at 1.1 The intent of the solicitation was âto enter into
a contract to procure janitorial services and hospital aseptic maintenance services for the VA
Northern California Health Care System, Martinez facility.â Id. at 3. The solicitation stated
that the Government âcomtemplate[d] award of a (Firm Fixed Price) contract.â Id. at 48.
Additionally, the solicitation was a set-aside for â[s]ervice-disabled veteran-owned small
business concern[s].â Id. at 101.
The Martinez facility included buildings for in-patient and out-patient care and various
other buildings related to research (âRâ buildings), and administration (âABâ buildings).
Exhibit 1 at 405-16. Building 20, the Center for Rehabilitation and Extended Care (CREC),
consisted of three patient-care wings: Tahoe, 11,493 square feet (sq. ft.); Shasta, 12,753 sq.
ft.; and Napa, 13,051 sq. ft. Exhibit 56 at 1. The cleanable area of other buildings on the
campus included the following: building 19, outpatient clinic (OPC), 14,017 sq. ft.; building
18, bio-med, 1292 sq. ft.; the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) trailer, 1295 sq. ft; R1,
12,348 sq. ft.; R2, 1412 sq. ft.; R3, 1800 sq. ft.; R4, 7920 sq. ft.; AB2, 3981 sq. ft.; AB4,
1937 sq. ft.; AB5, 1321 sq. ft.; AB6, 7409 sq. ft.; AB7, 11,702 sq. ft.; and AB21, 22,083 sq.
ft. Exhibits 56, 61.2
1
All exhibits are found in the appeal file, unless otherwise noted. The appeal
file consists of six volumes.
2
Subsequent to the hearing the Board determined that various documents in the
record contained inconsistent information as to the area of various buildings, and, in some
cases, such information was lacking. The Board directed the VA to provide complete
information as to the area, as measured in square feet, of the buildings and areas within
CBCA 4026 3
The solicitation provided for a contract performance period that consisted of a base
year and four option years. Exhibit 3 at 6-7. The pricing schedule required that offerors
propose a monthly unit price and total price for the base year and each option year. Id.
Additionally, offerors were required to submit information regarding technical capability,
technical approach, and past performance. Id.