ASBCA 59293
Board: ASBCA
Date: 2014-06-11
Outcome: sustained
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of -- )
)
Magwood Services, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 59293
)
Under Contract No. W912PQ-13-C-0016 )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Heyward R. Manigault
President
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.
Army Chief Trial Attorney
Erica S. Beardsley, Esq.
MAJ Ildiko Szentkiralyi, JA
Trial Attorneys
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE JAMES
This appeal arises from the contracting officer's (CO's) 24 April 2014 decision
that denied the $72,283.00 termination settlement proposal of Magwood Services, Inc.,
(Magwood) under the captioned contract. The Board has jurisdiction of the appeal
under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109. Magwood
elected an expedited disposition of the appeal and to submit its case upon the record
under Board Rules 12.2 and 11. The government elected a hearing, which was held
on 6 August 2014 in West Point, New York. The parties have submitted post-hearing
briefs. The Board is to decide both entitlement and quantum (tr. 1110).
SUMMARY FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Contract No. W912PQ-13-C-0016 (contract 16) was awarded to
Construction Solutions Group, LLC, on 17 July 2013 and was cancelled (Bd. corr. file,
app. 21July2014 filing; tr. 1/27). Contract 16 was awarded to Magwood effective
12 September 2013 (R4, tab 1 at 1-2 of 42, tab 3, ex. B). Contract 16 required
Magwood to replace two diversion holding tanks at Stratton Air National Guard Base,
Scotia, New York, for the fixed-price of $66,496.00 (R4, tab 1 at 1, 3 of 42).
1
The Contract Disputes Act, implemented by Board Rule 12.2, provides that this
decision shall have no value as precedent, and in the absence of fraud shall be
final and conclusive and may not be appealed or set aside.
2. Contract 16 included the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.249-2,
TERMINATION FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT (FIXED PRICE) (APR
2012) clause, which provided in pertinent part:
(e) After termination, the Contractor shall submit a final
termination settlement proposal to the (CO] in the form
and with the certification prescribed by the [CO]. ...
(f) Subject to paragraph (e) of this clause, the Contractor
and the [CO] may agree upon the whole or any part of the
amount to be paid ... because of the termination. The
amount may include a reasonable allowance for profit on
work done. However, the agreed amount, whether under
this paragraph [(f)] or paragraph (g) of this clause,
exclusive of costs shown in subparagraph (g)(3) of this
clause, may not exceed the total contract price ....
(g) If the Contractor and the [CO] fail to agree on the
whole amount to be paid because of the termination of
work, the [CO] shall pay the Contractor the amounts
determined by the [CO] as follows, but without duplication
of any amounts agreed on under paragraph (f) of this
clause:
( 1) The contract price for completed supplies or services
· accepted by the Government ... not previously paid for,
adjusted for any saving of freight or other charges.
(2) The total of-
(i) The costs incurred in the performance of the work
terminated, including initial costs and preparatory expense
allocable thereto, but excluding any costs attributable to
supplies or services paid or to be paid ...