ASBCA 58752
Board: ASBCA
Agency: National Guard Bureau
Appellant: Optimization Consulting, Inc.
Date: 2019-08-20
Outcome: denied
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of -- )
)
Optimization Consulting, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 58752
)
Under Contract No. W9I33L-10-D-0002 )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Sheridan England, Esq.
S. L. England, PLLC
Washington, DC
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.
Army Chief Trial Attorney
Robert B. Neill, Esq. ·
Trial Attorney
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE SCOTT
Appellant Optimization Consulting, Inc. (OCI) has timely appealed under the
Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109, from the contracting officer's (CO's)
denial of its claim under the captioned contract for psychological healthcare and related
data management services issued by the National Guard Bureau (NGB) on behalf of the
Air Nationai Guard (ANG). OCI seeks reimbursement for increased costs it alleges it
incurred when the government did not accept its proposed Management Information
System (MIS) or provide a government-furnished MIS. The Board denied the
government's motion for summary judgment. · Optimization Consulting, Inc., ASBCA
No. 58752, 15-1 BCA, 36,106 (Optimization I). Thereafter, the Board conducted a
one-day hearing on entitlement only (tr. 11). For the reasons set forth below, we deny
the appeal.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Solicitation and Contract
1. On August 10, 2018 NGB issued commercial item solicitation
No. W9I33L-10- R-0099 for an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contract for
mental health counseling and associated support services for members of ANG and
their families. The acquisition was set aside for service-disabled veteran-owned small
businesses. (R4, tab 2 at 1, 9, 41) 1 The Performance Work Statement (PWS)
1
Rule 4 citations are to the consecutively-stamped numbers unless otherwise
indicated.
imposed two broad categories of performance obligations, the first concerning
psychological health services (PHS) and the second, related records management and
reporting (R4, tab 2 at 45-103).
2. The contract and solicitation included Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
52.212-4, CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS- COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JUNE 2010),
which provides that "(c) Changes. Changes in the terms and conditions of this contract
may be made only by written agreement of the parties" (R4, tab 1 at 13; tab 2 at 24).
3. With respect to PHS, contractors were expected to staff 89 psychological
healthcare subject-matter experts (PHSMEs) at facilities throughout the United States
and its territories who would, among other things, oversee and coordinate mental health
services; provide a network of mental health clinicians to provide mental health support
to service members and their families; and undertake activities to promote
psychological wellness (R4, tab 2 at 3, 56, 78-80, 85-88).
4. The second category of performance obligations, records management and
reporting, is addressed primarily in PWS Section III.A, "Security and Records
Management," which describes the contractor's obligations relating to a "system of
records" and an MIS (R4, tab 2 at 94-103).
5. The parties' obligations with respect to the MIS are at the heart of this
dispute. The solicitation does not specifically define "MIS" but it refers to the MIS as a
data collection mechanism throughout Section III.A. as well as in other PWS
provisions, intermingled with discussions about how and what type of information was
· to be collected, maintained and reported to ANG. (R4, tab 2)
6. The most detailed discussion of the MIS appears in the following subsection
of Section III.A:
a. Management Information System () (Portions are
Optional for award)
The ANG is currently investigating a comprehensive
multi-layered tracking and data collection system for
many ANG personnel functions. The ANG may/may not
elect to utilize the total capability of Contractor's
comprehensive MIS system, butexpects the offeror to
provide and manage hardware necessary to accomplish
and effectively communicate as well as track activity of
the PHSME program.