CBCA 2878
Board: CBCA
Appellant: Jane Mobley Associates, Inc.
Date: 2016-01-05
Outcome: denied
DENIED: March 9, 2016
CBCA 2878
JANE MOBLEY ASSOCIATES, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Ralph C. Thomas III of Baker, Cronogue, Tolle & Werfel, LLP, McLean, VA, counsel
for Appellant.
Catherine Crow and John S. Tobey, Office of General Counsel, General Services
Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges DANIELS (Chairman), SHERIDAN, and KULLBERG.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
Jane Mobley Associates, Inc. (JMA) appeals the contracting officerâs final decision
finding that the General Services Administration (GSA or Government) overpaid JMA under
a firm-fixed-price task order and that, as a result, JMA is indebted to the Government in the
amount of $37,235.60 for JMAâs alleged overbilling. For the reasons that follow, we deny
the appeal.
CBCA 2878 2
Statement of Facts
I. Award and Performance of the Contract
A. The Schedule Contract
On May 14, 2004, in response to GSAâs solicitation for general marketing, media, and
public information services, JMA was awarded Federal Supply Schedule contract GS-23F-
0354P (schedule contract). The purpose of the solicitation was to procure media and
marketing services in order to meet GSAâs needs for such services, which could not be
satisfied in-house.
The schedule contract contemplated that the Government would issue task orders to
JMA to provide services from the schedule contractâs statement of work. In this regard, the
schedule contract provided:
A firm fixed price order shall be requested, unless the ordering office makes
a determination that it is not possible at the time of placing the order to
estimate accurately the extent or duration of the work or to anticipate cost with
any reasonable degree of confidence. When such a determination is made, a
labor hour or time-and-materials proposal may be requested. The firm-fixed
price shall be based on the prices in the schedule contract and shall consider
the mix of labor categories and level of effort required to perform the services
described in the statement of work.
Exhibit 45 at 85. JMA would then be paid in accordance with the applicable rates listed in
JMAâs schedule price list, which included overhead and profit. Regarding payment, JMA
offered a prompt payment discount of 0.5% for payments made within fifteen days from the
date of the invoice. In any event, payment for services was due within thirty days of receipt
of a proper invoice.
JMAâs schedule contract incorporated by reference the terms of the original
solicitation. Among the terms incorporated, several provisions of Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) 52.212-4, 48 CFR 52.212-4 (2003) are pertinent to this appeal:
(g)(1) The Contractor shall submit an original invoice and three copies (or
electronic invoice, if authorized) to the address designated in the contract to
receive invoices. An invoice must includeâ
....
CBCA 2878 3
(vi) Terms of any discount for prompt payment offered[.] (Emphasis
added.)
....
(g)(2) Invoices will be handled in accordance with the Prompt Payment Act
(31 U.S.C. 3903) and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) prompt
payment regulations at 5 CFR part 1315.
....
(i) Payment. . . . In connection with any discount offered for early payment,
time shall be computed from the date of the invoice. For the purposes of
computing the discount earned, payment shall be considered to have been
made on the date which appears on the payment check or the specified
payment date if an electronic funds transfer payment is made.
The schedule contract was updated at various times (called a ârefreshâ), which
modified some, but not all, of the terms and conditions of the original schedule contract.
Refresh eight, issued on January 5, 2010, added the following clause to the schedule contract:
(1)(ii)(D)(5) Overpayments/Underpayments. Each payment previously made
shall be subject to reduction to the extent of amounts, on preceding invoices,
that are found by the Contracting Officer not to have been properly payable
and shall also be subject to reduction for overpayments or to increase for
underpayments.
B.