ASBCA 63507
Board: ASBCA
Agency: Defense Logistics Agency
Appellant: BR Group
Date: 2024-11-07
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE.
The decision issued on the date below is subject to an ASBCA Protective Order.
This version has been approved for public release.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeals of - )
)
BR Group ) ASBCA Nos. 63507, 63744
)
Under Contract No. 4000890446 )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Salma William Saikaly, Esq.
Law Offices of Salma William Saikaly
Willoughby Hills, OH
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq.
DLA Chief Trial Attorney
Robin E. Walters, Esq.
Trial Attorney
DLA Disposition Services
Battle Creek, MI
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE STINSON ON GOVERNMENT’S
CONVERTED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO
DISMISS OR STRIKE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
These appeals concern an alleged mistake in bid arising out of a contract
between BR Group (BRG) and the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Disposition
Services for the purchase of foreign excess personal property (FEPP) at Camp Arifjan,
Kuwait. The government terminated the contract for default based upon BRG’s failure
to reimburse DLA in a timely manner for property BRG purchased under the contract.
Pending before the Board is the government’s February 12, 2024, motion to dismiss
for lack of jurisdiction, motion to strike, and motion to dismiss for failure to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted (gov’t mot.). BRG filed its response in
opposition to the government’s motions (which appellant titled “Answer”) on April 8,
2024 (app. opp’n). The government filed its reply brief on May 22, 2024 (gov’t
reply).
By Order dated June 4, 2024, the Board informed the parties that the
government’s motion for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
would be treated as a motion for summary judgment. (Bd. Order dtd. June 4, 2024
(citing Thai Hai, ASBCA No. 53375, 02-2 BCA ¶ 31,971 at 157,920; see FED. R. CIV.
P. 12(d) (“If, on a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) . . . matters outside the pleadings are
presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion must be treated as one for
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE.
The decision issued on the date below is subject to an ASBCA Protective Order.
This version has been approved for public release.
summary judgment under Rule 56”))). The Board likewise informed the parties that it
would consider the government’s statement of facts to be a statement of undisputed
material facts under Board Rule 7(c)(1) 1 and that, pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(d),
both parties would “be given a reasonable opportunity to present all the material that is
pertinent to the motion.”
On June 24, 2024, appellant filed its supplemental brief, titled “appellant’s
opposition to the government’s motion for summary judgment” (app. sur-reply), and
on July 31, 2024, the government filed its supplemental brief, titled “government’s
response to appellant’s opposition to the government’s motion for summary judgment”
(gov’t sur-reply). Included with the government’s response were two exhibits:
Exhibit A, Declaration of Scott C. Rogers, Sales Contracting Officer (SCO), and
Exhibit B, selected documents setting forth selected bid information submitted by
BRG and five other companies who responded to the invitation for bids (IFB). Noting
that the government’s filing included the above-referenced declaration and additional
documents, by Order dated August 5, 2024, the Board informed the parties that
appellant had the option of filing a brief in reply to the government’s response, should
it so choose. On August 26, 2024, appellant filed its reply, titled “appellants response
to government response to the opposition to the government’s motion for summary
judgment” (app. sur-sur-reply).
STATEMENT OF FACTS (SOF) FOR PURPOSES OF THE MOTIONS
IFB for Disposition Services
1. On June 11, 2021, 2 DLA Disposition Services issued IFB No. 39-1001 for
disposition services and sale of scrap metal and residue from other mutilated
commodities in Kuwait (R4, tab 1 at 1). 3
2. The IFB set June 28, 2021, as the closing date for submission of sealed bids
and specified that “a single award will be made to a single responsive and responsible
bidder who bids the highest cumulative price for all seven (7) Items” (id.