ASBCA 60780
Board: ASBCA
Agency: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Appellant: Burnham Associates, Inc.
Date: 2017-12-13
Outcome: remanded
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of -- )
)
Burnham Associates, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 60780
)
Under Contract No. W912WJ-12-C-0009 )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: John D. Fitzpatrick, Esq.
Pingitore & Fitzpatrick, LLC
Cambridge, MA
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Thomas J. Warren, Esq.
Acting Engineer Chief Trial Attorney
Theresa A. Negron, Esq.
Engineer Trial Attorney
U.S. Army Engineer District, New England
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE O'CONNELL
This appeal arises from a contract to perform dredging in Boston Harbor.
Burnham Associates, Inc. (Burnham) submitted a certified claim seeking additional
money on two issues: $334,464 due to the government's use of a previously undisclosed
pre-dredge survey to calculate final quantities; and $70,144.94 due to delays caused by
shipping traffic in the harbor. The parties have both filed motions for summary judgment
and briefs supporting their respective positions. Upon discussion with the Board
regarding whether material facts were in dispute, the parties agreed to submit this appeal
on the written record under Board Rule 11. The Board allowed the parties to file
supplemental briefs, Rule 4 supplements, or declarations. Only entitlement is before us.
We sustain the appeal as to the pre-dredge survey but deny it with respect to the shipping
traffic delays.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On 16 May 2012, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England District,
(Corps or USACE) issued a solicitation for a project entitled "Rock Removal, Boston
Harbor Boston, Massachusetts" (R4, tab 6 at 1). The contract subsequently incorporated
the solicitation (R4, tab 12 at 2).
Pre-Dredge Surveys
2. The Geotechnical Data section of the solicitation stated that a USACE
contractor had conducted "a bathymetric, geophysical and geotechnical investigation of
areas shown in the contract drawings from May-June 2010" (R4, tab 6 at 37). Somewhat
confusingly, however, the drawings indicated that they were based upon a hydrographic
survey conducted in March 2011 (id. at 170-71 ).
3. The Summary of Work section stated that seven areas of rock had been
identified "during the recent subsurface investigations of Boston Harbor" and that there
were about 525 cubic yards of material to be removed (R4, tab 6 at 43).
4. The Measurement and Payment section of the solicitation provided that
USACE would pay contract line item number (CLIN) 0002 (dredging and disposal of
rock) "by computing the volume between the bottom surface shown by soundings of the
last pre-dredge survey made before dredging begins and the bottom surface shown by
the soundings of a post-dredge survey made as soon as practicable after the removal of
the material" (R4, tab 6 at 50). The solicitation provided that the contractor would not
be paid for material dredged outside the defined areas (id. at 152); it refers to the
material eligible for payment as the "payable quantity" (id. at 127).
5. Depths in areas that have been dredged can change over time due to currents,
ship traffic stirring up the bottom, large tide fluctuations, and/or weather (R4, tab 38, ii 2
(supp. Preston decl.)). As a result, the Corps generally conducts a pre-dredge survey
within six months of the start of dredging (id. ii 12). Consistent with this practice, the
solicitation stated that another pre-dredge survey "may be performed by the Government
prior to the start of Contractor dredging operations at the dredging sites" (R4, tab 6 at
43-44). However, the Corps opted not to conduct a pre-award/pre-dredging
commencement survey (R4, tabs 9-10).
6. While the bidders only knew about the March 2011 and earlier surveys, the
Corps had, in fact, conducted a survey within the six-month pre-dredge window when it
issued the solicitation, namely, a hydrographic survey of the harbor conducted on 12,
14 and 15 March 2012 (R4, tabs 4, 30). The Corps conducted this survey in response to a
request from the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport), which was aware of the
incomplete rock removal in the federally-maintained portion of the harbor channel and was
concerned that it might affect a tall ships/War of 1812 bicentennial event planned that
summer.