CBCA 6997
Board: CBCA
Agency: Department of State
Appellant: Framaco International Inc.
Date: 2026-03-16
Outcome: dismissed
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 16, 2026
CBCA 6997, 6998, 7112, 7354, 7478, 7505, 7506, 7507, 7509, 7514, 7525, 7526,
7536, 7537, 7538, 7549, 7550, 7551, 7560, 7562, 7563, 7564, 7570, 7571, 7572,
7574, 7590, 7606, 7607, 7612, 7623, 7624, 7625, 7628, 7629, 7630, 7631, 7640,
7649, 7660, 7668, 7672, 7685, 7686, 7696, 7697, 7698, 7699, 7700, 7707, 7708,
7709, 7711, 7726, 7727, 7728, 7729, 7733, 7747, 7748, 7765, 7825, 7834, 7835,
7836, 7837, 7838, 7839, 7840, 7841, 7842, 7843, 7844, 7845, 7846, 7847, 7848,
7849, 7850, 7852, 7853, 7854, 7855, 7856, 7859, 7860, 7883, 7886, 7912, 7913,
7932, 7970, 7986, 7987, 8036, 8045, 8046, 8100
FRAMACO INTERNATIONAL INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Douglas L. Patin, Erik M. Coon, and Jennifer M. Ersin of Bradley Arant Boult
Cummings LLP, Washington, DC; and Sam Z. Gdanski and Abraham S. Gdanski of Gdanski
Law PC, Teaneck, NJ, counsel for Appellant.
Matthew S. Tilghman and Alexandra N. Wilson, Office of the Legal Adviser,
Buildings and Acquisitions, Department of State, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
CBCA 6997, et al. 2
ORDER
On March 11, 2026, the Board docketed the parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss With
Prejudice All Appeals Under Contract No. SAQMMA-15-C-0268. The parties explained
that they had resolved all pending appeals brought by appellant under the contract. Thus,
they sought an order dismissing the appeals with prejudice pursuant to their settlement
agreement and Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2)(2024)).
Most of the ninety-eight pending appeals listed above had not been consolidated as
of the date of the filing of the parties’ motion. By order dated March 12, 2026, the Board
requested the parties’ position on consolidating all of the pending appeals for the purpose of
dismissal. In their response, also dated March 12, 2026, the parties stated that they had no
objection to consolidating the appeals for this purpose. Accordingly, all pending appeals are
consolidated.
As for the motion to dismiss, the Board commends the parties on reaching settlement.
Further, consistent with the parties’ motion, all pending appeals brought by appellant under
the contract and consolidated by this order are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Beverly M. Russell
BEVERLY M. RUSSELL
Board Judge