CBCA 6997

Board: CBCA Agency: Department of State Appellant: Framaco International Inc. Date: 2026-03-16 Outcome: dismissed
View full appeal with AI analysis on ProtestIntel →
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: March 16, 2026 CBCA 6997, 6998, 7112, 7354, 7478, 7505, 7506, 7507, 7509, 7514, 7525, 7526, 7536, 7537, 7538, 7549, 7550, 7551, 7560, 7562, 7563, 7564, 7570, 7571, 7572, 7574, 7590, 7606, 7607, 7612, 7623, 7624, 7625, 7628, 7629, 7630, 7631, 7640, 7649, 7660, 7668, 7672, 7685, 7686, 7696, 7697, 7698, 7699, 7700, 7707, 7708, 7709, 7711, 7726, 7727, 7728, 7729, 7733, 7747, 7748, 7765, 7825, 7834, 7835, 7836, 7837, 7838, 7839, 7840, 7841, 7842, 7843, 7844, 7845, 7846, 7847, 7848, 7849, 7850, 7852, 7853, 7854, 7855, 7856, 7859, 7860, 7883, 7886, 7912, 7913, 7932, 7970, 7986, 7987, 8036, 8045, 8046, 8100 FRAMACO INTERNATIONAL INC., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Respondent. Douglas L. Patin, Erik M. Coon, and Jennifer M. Ersin of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Washington, DC; and Sam Z. Gdanski and Abraham S. Gdanski of Gdanski Law PC, Teaneck, NJ, counsel for Appellant. Matthew S. Tilghman and Alexandra N. Wilson, Office of the Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions, Department of State, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent. RUSSELL, Board Judge. CBCA 6997, et al. 2 ORDER On March 11, 2026, the Board docketed the parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice All Appeals Under Contract No. SAQMMA-15-C-0268. The parties explained that they had resolved all pending appeals brought by appellant under the contract. Thus, they sought an order dismissing the appeals with prejudice pursuant to their settlement agreement and Board Rule 12(b)(2) (48 CFR 6101.12(b)(2)(2024)). Most of the ninety-eight pending appeals listed above had not been consolidated as of the date of the filing of the parties’ motion. By order dated March 12, 2026, the Board requested the parties’ position on consolidating all of the pending appeals for the purpose of dismissal. In their response, also dated March 12, 2026, the parties stated that they had no objection to consolidating the appeals for this purpose. Accordingly, all pending appeals are consolidated. As for the motion to dismiss, the Board commends the parties on reaching settlement. Further, consistent with the parties’ motion, all pending appeals brought by appellant under the contract and consolidated by this order are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Beverly M. Russell BEVERLY M. RUSSELL Board Judge