ASBCA 57515
Board: ASBCA
Date: 2013-05-28
Outcome: denied
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal ofâ )
)
Gargoyles, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 57515
)
Under Contract No. W912ER-11 -C-0012 )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Kenneth A. Martin, Esq.
The Martin Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
McLean, VA
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.
Engineer Chief Trial Attorney
Jeremy Becker-Welts, Esq.
James A. Wallace, Esq.
Engineer Trial Attorneys
U.S. Army Engineer District, Middle East
Winchester, VA
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE THRASHER
Appellant, Gargoyles, Inc. (Gargoyles), appeals the termination for cause of its
commercial items contract to deliver 56 light armored vehicles (LAVs) to Victory Base
Complex (VBC), Camp Wolfe, Baghdad, Iraq, 10 days after award of the contract.
Gargoyles requests that we convert the termination for cause to a termination for
convenience, alleging the government waived the delivery schedule, failed to issue a
10-day cure notice, and government actions constituted excusable delay. We have
jurisdiction under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109.
We deny the appeal.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The Solicitation
1. On 24 November 2010, the U.S. Corps of Engineers (USACE) Gulf Region
District (GRD) issued Solicitation No. W912ER-1 l-R-0035 (the solicitation) for a firm
fixed-price commercial items contract to acquire transportation services for the USACE
mission in Iraq.1 The solicitation Performance Work Statement (PWS) stated the
1 The solicitation cover sheet was Standard Form 1449 prescribed by FAR 53.213 for
commercial item solicitations. The solicitation also included the FAR commercial
item evaluation solicitation clauses and contract clauses, 52.212-1 and 52.212-2
(R4, tab 1 at 66-86 of 168).
awardee would provide transportation services to include LAVs, routine maintenance,
major, minor and emergency repairs, washing, general cleaning, and recovery and towing
services of disabled vehicles throughout Iraq. (R4, tab 1 at 3, 66-86 of 168) In addition,
the solicitation PWS required that services were to be provided at five locations in Iraq
and that the awardee would provide a fleet of vehicles designated by USACE to execute
the transportation services requirements of GRD. The solicitation specified the required
vehicle fleet was to consist of 2007 or newer LAVs Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV) style.
(Id.) The period of performance was for a three-month base period with one three-month
option period (R4, tab 1 at 3, 6 of 168).
2. The solicitation set forth specific performance deadlines. Although the general
phase-in period was 30 days, Section 3.0 "REQUIREMENTS" of the PWS specified that
the awardee was required to deliver at a minimum, 56 LAVs to VBC 10 days after award
of the contract (R4, tab 1 at 4 of 168). Section 7.0 "TRANSPORTATION SERVICES"
reiterated that the awardee was required to deliver a minimum of 56 LAVs to VBC
within 10 days after award (R4, tab 1 at 6-7 of 168). Section 4.0 "DELIVERABLES" of
the PWS specified that the awardee was required to deliver its: Phase-In Plan; Vehicle
Operations Plan; and, Quality Control Plan 10 days after award (R4, tab 1 at 6-7 of 168).
Ms. Betty Rogers, the contracting officer (CO) who conducted market research and
issued the solicitation, testified the 10-day delivery requirement was to ensure continuity
of services because of the imminent phase out of the incumbent contract, stating, "it was
critical that this 10-day timeline be met in order to ensure that our folks could go to the
project sites and utilize the security services provided at this site" (tr. 1/36). Although the
10-day delivery schedule was an aggressive requirement, none of the 16 offerers,
including Gargoyles, questioned the requirement (tr. 1/34, 41).
3. Special contract requirement 1.0, "DEPLOYMENT PROCESSING," requires
all contractor personnel to process through the CONUS Replacement Center (CRC) or an
alternate center approved by the CO before they can deploy to Iraq (R4, tab 1 at 40 of
168). Pursuant to contract requirement 2.0, contractor personnel require issuance of a
Letter of Authorization (LOA) to process through the CRC (R4, tab 1 at 41 of 168).
Gargoyles Proposal
4. The solicitation was amended four times (R4, tab 1).