CBCA 5149
Board: CBCA
Agency: General Services Administration
Appellant: Strawberry Hill, LLC
Date: 2016-11-22
Outcome: dismissed
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM: November 22, 2016
CBCA 5149
STRAWBERRY HILL, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Robert K. Stewart, Jr. of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Anchorage, AK, counsel for
Appellant.
Leonard E. Lucas III, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration,
Nashville, TN, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges SOMERS, HYATT, and WALTERS.
SOMERS, Board Judge.
In this appeal, Strawberry Hill, LLC (appellant or lessor) seeks payment of annual rent
under a lease amendment between it and the General Services Administration (GSA or the
Government). Pending before the Board is GSAâs motion to dismiss for failure to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted. After reviewing GSAâs motion, appellantâs
opposition thereto, the reply, the pleadings, and supplemental briefing requested by the Board
on the issue of jurisdiction over the amended claim, we grant the motion to dismiss the
appeal.
CBCA 5149 2
Background
GSA and the lessor entered into a lease on April 29, 2010, for 3202 rentable square
feet of general office space and reserved surface parking spaces. Part III of the lease
agreement, entitled âAward,â stated, in bold type, that âThis document is not binding on the
Government of the United States of America unless signed below by authorized contracting
officer.â Supplemental lease agreement no. 1 provided the following:
Terms and Conditions: All prior terms and conditions of this Lease as
expressly contained herein represent the total obligations of the Lessor and the
Government. Any agreements, written or oral, between the parties prior to the
execution of this agreement are not applicable or binding. This agreement may
be amended only by written instrument executed by the Lessor and the
Government.
In December 2014, GSA submitted to the lessor a request for additional office space
for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA or tenant agency). At the
time of the request, the lessor had one office suite that could be made available to satisfy
GSAâs request for additional space. The lessor determined that it would be in the lessorâs
financial interest to accommodate NOAAâs new space needs by âentering into a lease
agreement with GSA.â Soon thereafter, the lessor began to negotiate with a GSA project
manager on leasing two spaces, office suite 109 and apartment 411. The lessor took the
apartment and the office space off the market and began to prepare the spaces for NOAAâs
planned move-in date. The parties agreed that the lessor would amortize the February and
March rent over the first twelve months of the lease period, i.e., from April 2015 to March
2016.
In April 2015, the project manager sent draft lease amendments to the leasing
contracting officer (the contracting officer or CO) for review. On April 10, 2015, the
contracting officer sent the lease amendments to the lessor for its signature. The lessor
signed the lease amendments and returned them to the contracting officer.
Several days later, NOAA informed GSA that it had received an offer from the Alaska
State Troopers (the other agency) to sublease to NOAA used space in the same building. On
May 12, 2015, NOAA formally notified appellantâs project manager that it no longer needed
the office space. Shortly thereafter, the contracting officer informed the lessor that the tenant
agency no longer needed the office suite and that GSA would not be signing the lease
amendment. Ultimately, GSA signed a supplemental lease agreement to add apartment 411
to the lease, but did not sign the supplemental lease agreement for suite 109.
CBCA 5149 3
By letter dated June 12, 2015, the lessor submitted a claim to the contracting officer.
In that claim, the lessor requested âthe first year annual rent as defined in the original [lease
agreement] of $51,457.69 as compensation for the time that the office suite was taken off the
market and for various cost[s] incurred to prepare the Suite for GSA.â Appellant certified
the claim. GSAâs contracting officer denied the claim on October 8, 2015, stating, in part:
After sending the [supplemental lease agreement] to [the lessor] for signature,
GSA was notified that NOAA no longer had a requirement to expand their
current GSA lease in Dutch Harbor.