ASBCA 63449
Board: ASBCA
Agency: Navy
Appellant: CB Portable Toilet Rental and Services
Date: 2024-08-26
Outcome: sustained
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of - )
)
CB Portable Toilet Rental and Services ) ASBCA No. 63449
)
Under Contract No. N00189-22-P-0368 )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Chizoma B. Onyems
President
Auburn, CA
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.
Navy Chief Trial Attorney
James P. Winthrop, Esq.
Autumn W. Hazy, Esq.
James Vaiden, Esq.
Trial Attorneys
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MELNICK REGARDING QUANTUM
On August 16, 2023, the Board issued its entitlement ruling in this appeal
briefed at appellantâs request under Board Rule 11. CB Portable Toilet Rental Svcs,
ASBCA No. 63449, 23-1 BCA ¶ 38,421. The matter arises from the termination for
convenience of a contract for the delivery and maintenance of portable toilets and hand
washing stations for use at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. The entitlement decision is
summarized as follows.
The government awarded the contract to CB Portable on May 27, 2022. It
contained FAR 52.212-4, CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONSâ
COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (NOV 2021). Id.
at 186,711.
The contract contained five line items (CLINs) identifying five training sites.
At each site two portable toilets and one hand washing station were to be located and
serviced for scheduled weeks, beginning in June or July 2022, running into September
with later dates contemplated. Generally, each week on a site was a contract âunit.â
All five CLINs specified $1,030 as the price of a unit. The five CLINs were subject to
DFARS 252.232-7007, LIMITATION OF GOVERNMENTâS OBLIGATION (APR
2014), (âLOGOâ clause), which limited the governmentâs payment obligations to an
allotted amount. Although the total price of the contract was $145,230, at the time of
award, the five CLINs had only been allotted $29,870 in funding. Id.
Separately, the contract required two âperpetualâ portable restrooms and one
hand washing station to include maintenance and cleaning service twice a month at an
unidentified site. Id. Though no price was given for this requirement, the Board
concluded that $1,030 per week was also reasonable. Id. at 186,715.
Finally, during performance, the parties agreed to a contract change permitting
the government to order units for additional locations and times at the $1,030 price.
Id. at 186,712, 186,715.
On August 12, 2022, the government terminated the contract for convenience,
effective August 19, 2022. The government also added funding for the five CLINs
that brought the total allotted to $32,960, which it paid to CB Portable. CB Portable
completed services and stopped operations as of August 19. Id. at 186,713.
CB Portableâs appeal sought additional compensation beyond the governmentâs
payment. The government argued that CB Portableâs recovery was strictly limited by
the LOGO clause to the $32,960 it had allotted to the contract and already paid. Id.
at 186,715. The Board recognized that under this commercial item contractâs
termination for convenience provision CB Portable should ââbe paid a percentage of
the contract price reflecting the percentage of the work performed . . . plus reasonable
chargesâ that CB Portable âcan demonstrate . . . have resulted from the termination.ââ
Id. at 186,714. The Board noted the governmentâs concession that CB Portable
performed the five CLINs and perpetual requirement as scheduled until the effective
date of the termination. It held that the liability constraints of the LOGO clause
applied only to the five CLINs but not to the perpetual requirement or the changed
work. Given that the contract price for CB Portableâs performance of the five CLINs
only exhausted $21,630 of the $32,960 allotted to them, CB Portable was entitled to
the price of their performance. Additionally, it found CB Portable was entitled to the
contract price for its performance of the perpetual provision and for units provided in
response to government orders stemming from the contract change. Id. at 186,715-16.
Turning to the termination clauseâs provision for âreasonable chargesâ resulting
from the termination, the Board observed this âbroadly requires payment of charges
that do not relate to work completed but fairly compensateâ CB Portable, including
profit on some components. Id. at 186,716 (citing SWR, Inc., ASBCA No. 56708,
15-1 BCA ¶ 35,832 at 175,223).