ASBCA 63348
Board: ASBCA
Agency: Navy
Appellant: CB Portable Toilet Rental and Services
Date: 2026-03-10
Outcome: dismissed
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Application Under the Equal Access to )
Justice Act of -- )
)
CB Portable Toilet Rental and Services ) ASBCA No. 63449-EAJA
)
Under Contract No. N00189-22-P-0368 )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Chizoma Onyems
President
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Allison M. McDade, Esq.
Navy Chief Trial Attorney
James Vaiden, Esq.
Trial Attorney
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MELNICK
ON APPELLANTâS EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE APPLICATION
Mr. Chizoma Onyems, sole owner of CB Portable Toilet Rental and Services
(CB Portable), seeks to recover fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act
(EAJA), 5 U.S.C § 504, after CB Portableâs appeal was sustained and it was awarded
compensation after submissions without a hearing under Board Rule 11. CB Portable
Toilet Rental & Servs., ASBCA No. 63449, 23-1 BCA ¶ 38,421 (CB Portable I)
(entitlement); CB Portable Toilet Rental & Servs., ASBCA No. 63449, 24-1 BCA
¶ 38,664 (CB Portable II) (quantum). Familiarity with these prior decisions is
presumed. Mr. Onyems has not shown he is a prevailing party qualified to submit an
EAJA application. If the application is more properly construed as coming from
CB Portable, it is untimely and we lack jurisdiction to entertain it.
BACKGROUND
On May 27, 2022, the Navy awarded Contract No. N00189-22-P-0368 to
CB Portable for the pickup, drop off, and service of portable toilets at various locations
at Camp LeJeune, North Carolina at a total price of $145,230 (R4, tabs 1 at 1, 9 at 106-
12). The contractâs period of performance consisted of five 12-month ordering periods
running from June 13, 2022 through June 12, 2023 (R4, tab 9 at 114). On August 19,
2022, CB Portable submitted a certified claim to the Navyâs contracting officer (CO)
seeking compensation for 26 categories of alleged costs totaling $398,678.05 (R4,
tab 31 at 242, 246, 248-51). CB Portable submitted an amended claim for an
additional $52,449.60 for delay costs it incurred between August 22 and
September 18, 2022 (R4, tab 35). On October 10, 2022, CB Portable submitted a final
amended claim seeking costs for four new categories in addition to the 26 from its
initial claim for a grand total of $489,567.65 (R4, tab 42 at 361, 372).
The CO issued a final decision (COFD) on November 4, 2022, denying
CB Portableâs claim (R4, tab 1). CB Portable appealed the COFD to the Board, and
on August 16, 2023, the Board sustained the appeal. CB Portable I, 23-1 BCA
¶ 38,421 at 186,716-17. CB Portable submitted a request for reimbursement of
attorney fees and expenses totaling $185,500 pursuant to the EAJA on April 20, 2024.
By Order dated August 2, 2024, the Board denied CB Portableâs EAJA request as
premature because the quantum phase of the appeal was still pending and advised
CB Portable that â[i]f appellant subsequently qualifies as a prevailing party otherwise
eligible under the EAJA, appellant may file a proper applicationâ (Bd. Order
dtd. August 2, 2024).
On August 26, 2024, after the quantum phase of the proceedings, the Board
awarded CB Portable $16,150 plus interest. CB Portable II, 24-1 BCA ¶ 38,664
at 187,952. Mr. Onyems, appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit in his own personal capacity on August 29, 2024 (answer ¶ 41). The
Federal Circuit dismissed Mr. Onyemsâ appeal for lack of jurisdiction on June 6, 2025,
finding that he was not a âcontractorâ within the meaning of the Contract Disputes Act
(CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109. Onyems v. Depât of the Navy, 2025 WL 1603783
at *3 (Fed. Cir. June 6, 2025). The Federal Circuit denied Mr. Onyemsâ subsequent
petition for a panel rehearing on June 30, 2025 (Fed. Cir. Order dtd. June 30, 2025).
On August 1, 2025, Mr. Onyems submitted an âInvoice for EAJAâ to the Board
seeking a total of $361,975.37 for various litigation fees allegedly incurred during the
course of CB Portableâs appeal (app. EAJA invoice). Mr. Onyems is not an attorney
and has represented CB Portable pro se throughout its appeals.
DECISION
Addendum 1 to the Boardâs Rules, Equal Access to Justice Act Procedures,
implements the EAJAâs statutory requirements and the Boardâs procedures pertaining
to EAJA proceedings.