CBCA 3724-R
Board: CBCA
Appellant: Leeward Construction Corporation
Date: 2015-03-24
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION GRANTED;
DECISION MODIFIED: March 24, 2015
CBCA 3724-R
LEEWARD CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
Donald R. Adams, Project Manager of Leeward Construction Corporation, Fort
Worth, TX, appearing for Appellant.
Lindsay C. Roop and Dennis M. McGuire, Office of Regional Counsel, Department
of Veterans Affairs, Columbus, OH, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges POLLACK, McCANN, and ZISCHKAU.
McCANN, Board Judge.
Respondent has moved for partial reconsideration of the Boardâs decision issued on
January 26, 2015. Leeward Construction Corp. v. Department of Veterans Affairs, CBCA
3724, 15-1 ¶ 35,861. Respondent contends that the Board, in the quantum portion of its
decision, id. at 175,338, incorrectly awarded appellant ten percent for profit and ten percent
for overhead and should only have awarded appellant a ten percent fee. Appellant has
declined to file a response to the motion.
Respondent is correct. In its initial decision, the Board determined appellantâs fee by
incorrectly applying subsection (4), rather than (5), of the Department of Veterans Affairs
Acquisition Regulation (VAAR) 852.236-88(b) (48 CFR 852.236-88(b) (2011)). The
subsections state:
CBCA 3724-R 2
(4) Allowances not to exceed 10 percent each for overhead and profit for the
party performing the work will be based on the value of labor, material, and
use of construction equipment required to accomplish the change. As the
value of the change increases, a declining scale will be used in negotiating the
percentage of overhead and profit. Allowable percentages on changes will not
exceed the following: 10 percent overhead and 10 percent profit on the first
$20,000; 7-1/2 percent overhead and 7-1/2 percent profit on the next $30,000;
5 percent overhead and 5 percent profit on balance over $50,000. Profit shall
be computed by multiplying the profit percentage by the sum of the direct costs
and computed overhead costs.
(5) The prime contractorâs or upper-tier subcontractorâs fee on work performed
by lower-tier subcontractors will be based on the net increased cost to the
prime contractor or upper-tier subcontractor as applicable. Allowable fee on
changes will not exceed the following: 10 percent fee on the first $20,000; 7-
1/2 percent fee on the next $30,000; and 5 percent fee on balance over
$50,000.
VAAR 852.236-88(b).
Since appellant is a prime contractor and the contract work was performed by a
subcontractor, VAAR 852.236-88(b)(5) is the provision that applies here. Appellant is
entitled to a ten percent fee, rather than ten percent profit and ten percent overhead.
Decision
Respondentâs motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. The first sentence of the
final paragraph of the discussion portion of the Boardâs decision is modified to read as
follows: âLeeward is entitled to an additional ten percent fee.â
______________________________
R. ANTHONY McCANN
Board Judge
We concur:
________________________________ _______________________________
HOWARD A. POLLACK JONATHAN D. ZISCHKAU
Board Judge Board Judge