ASBCA 61096
Board: ASBCA
Agency: Army
Appellant: Ruby Emerald Construction Company
Date: 2018-11-06
Outcome: denied
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of -- )
)
Ruby Emerald Construction Company ) ASBCA No. 61096
)
Under Contract No. W5K9FH-12-P-0028 )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Bashir Ahmady
Authorized Corporate Officer
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.
Army Chief Trial Attorney
MAJ Bruce H. Robinson, JA
Trial Attorney
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE WOODROW ON THE
GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
In November 2011, the Army entered into an arrangement with appellant for the
purchase of crushed gravel. The nature of that arrangement is at issue in this appeal. The
Army argues that it was a purchase order that the Army cancelled prior to acceptance,
and that appellant has therefore failed to establish the existence of an actual contract. On
that basis the Army moves to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted. In the alternative, in the event the Board finds that a contract did exist, the Army
moves for summary judgment because appellant signed a bilateral modification
cancelling the contract at no cost to the Army. We possess jurisdiction to entertain this
appeal under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109. We deny the
Army's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (which we have treated as a motion
for summary judgment), but grant the Army's alternate motion for summary judgment.
STATEMENT OF FACTS (SOF) FOR PURPOSES OF THE MOTION
1. On November 23, 2011, the Army solicited a "firm-fixed-price commercial items
quotation [from appellant] under Contract No. W5K9FH-12-P-0028" for the purchase of
gravel (gov't mot. at 2). Although the Rule 4 file does not contain any document identified
by the Army as the solicitation (or appellant's response thereto), it does include a document
identified as "Contract No. W5K9FH-12-P-0028" (contract), which consists of a two-page
Standard Form (SF) 1449 with an additional 10 pages attached that include a description of
the work to be performed, various contract terms and conditions and certain applicable
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses (R4, tab 1).
I
I 2. By email dated November 23, 2011, the contracting officer notified appellant
that it "has been awarded Contract [No.] W5K9FH-12-P-0028 in the amount of
$1,635,700.00," and forwarded to appellant a copy of the contract. The contracting
officer requested appellant to "[p]lease ... review and sign blocks 30a, 30b, and 30c of the
attached contract and return to me as soon as possible." The contracting officer also
informed appellant that "[r]eceipt of this notification serves as the notice to proceed
(NTP) for this contract" and reminded appellant that delivery was required "no later than
3 7 days after date of contract." (R4, tab 2 at 1-13)
3. The SF 1449 portion of the contract includes both the captioned contract
number and a solicitation number. Block 6 of the SF 1449 indicates that the solicitation
was issued on November 5, 2011, and block 14 identifies the method of solicitation as a
request for quotation (RFQ). (R4, tab 1 at 1, tab 2 at 2)
4. Block 28 advises the contractor that it is required to sign and return the
document, and states that the contractor "agrees to furnish and deliver all items set forth
or otherwise identified above and on any additional sheets subject to the terms and
conditions specified herein." Block 28, which is checked, also contains the notation
"REF: Your Quote." (R4, tab 1 at 1, tab 2 at 2)
5. Block 29 lists an "offer" date ofNovember 11, 2011, and includes language
stating that the contractor's "offer on [the] solicitation .. .including any additions or
changes which are set forth herein, is accepted." Block 29 is not checked. (R4,
tab 1 at 1, tab 2 at 2)
6. Blocks 30a-c for the offeror/contractor' s signature, name and signature date are
all blank. Blocks 3 la-c for the contracting officer's signature, name and signature date
have all been completed, and indicate that the contracting officer signed the document on
November 23, 2011. (R4, tab 1 at 1, tab 2 at 2)
7. Contract line item numbers (CLINs) 1 through 3 all require that delivery "begin
within 7 days after contract award.