CBCA 7847
Board: CBCA
Agency: Department of State
Appellant: Framaco International Inc.
Date: 2024-09-27
Outcome: denied
THIS OPINION WAS INITIALLY ISSUED UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER AND
IS BEING PUBLICLY RELEASED IN ITS ENTIRETY ON OCTOBER 1, 2024
GRANTED IN PART: September 27, 2024
CBCA 7847
FRAMACO INTERNATIONAL INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE,
Respondent.
Douglas L. Patin and Erik M. Coon of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP,
Washington, DC; and Sam Z. Gdanski and Abraham S. Gdanski of Gdanski Law PC,
Teaneck, NJ, counsel for Appellant.
Thomas D. Dinackus, Matthew S. Tilghman, and Alexandra N. Wilson, Office of the
Legal Adviser, Buildings and Acquisitions, Department of State, Washington, DC, counsel
for Respondent.
Before Board Judges BEARDSLEY (Chair), RUSSELL, and OâROURKE.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
Appellant, Framaco International Inc. (Framaco), has filed 131 cases with the Board
(certain of which are consolidated) based on its contract with respondent, Department of
State (State or agency), Bureau of Overseas Building Operations (OBO), to construct an
embassy compound in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea.
CBCA 7847 2
This decision is being issued in accordance with the Boardâs order on further
proceedings of October 19, 2023 (Order), which largely adopted the partiesâ proposal to
resolve approximately 100 of appellantâs non-consolidated appeals brought pursuant to
Board Rule 53 (48 CFR 6101.53 (2023)), along with certain claims in four of its consolidated
appeals that were not based on Government-caused delay. See Rule 53 (governing
accelerated procedures, which are available at an appellantâs election but limited to appeals
involving amounts in dispute of $100,000 or less); see also Rule 1(a) (âThe Board may alter
[its] procedures on its own initiative or on request of a party to promote the just, informal,
expeditious, and inexpensive resolution of a case.â). The Order states that â[t]he presiding
judge with the two members of the panel . . . will decide the following appeals for which the
parties will submit briefing: CBCA 7508, 7512, 7513, 7549, 7561, 7572, 7573, 7625, 7695,
7712, 7847, and 7859 (âSelected Appealsâ).â The Order additionally states, âDecisions
rendered by the panel will be in summary form either in writing or orally, if a hearing is held;
will be final and conclusive; will not be set aside, except for fraud; and will not be
precedential.â
As agreed to by the parties, quantum in the non-consolidated appeals and certain
claims in four of Framacoâs consolidated appeals to which the Order applies will be decided
based on a formula derived from any damage amounts awarded to Framaco in the Selected
Appeals. In a subsequent joint response filed with the Board on March 19, 2024, the parties
confirmed that the Order applies to the appeals described above.
In this appeal (CBCA 7847), Framaco seeks $74,498 for six work items which
Framaco asserts resulted from Stateâs alleged constructive design changes and design
discrepancies, and/or Stateâs alleged requests that Framaco perform work outside the scope
of the contract. As explained below, with the exception of one item, the appeal is denied.
Background
In September 2015, State awarded Framaco a firm-fixed-price contract, initially
valued at approximately $97 million, to construct the New Embassy Compound (NEC) in
Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea. Appeal File, Exhibit 1 at DOS-PTMO-00982321.1 The
project was originally designed in 2010 as a âStandard Secure mini-Compoundâ (SSmC)
with a scope that included a lock-and-leave new office building, a perimeter security wall
and fence, a main compound entry pavilion (MCAP), a service entry/utility building, and a
support annex. Exhibit 2 at DOS-PTMO-00982414. Construction of the SSmC facility
began in 2012, but in 2013, after forty percent of the project was completed, a future marine
1
All exhibits are found in the appeal file, unless otherwise noted.
CBCA 7847 3
detachment was planned for Port Moresby and the embassy staffing requirement was
increased. Id. State therefore descoped the work under the 2012 contract and closed out that
contract. The project was redesigned under an expanded NEC, incorporating the completed
portions of the SSmC project as well as surplus equipment and materials, where appropriate.
Id.