ASBCA 57779
Board: ASBCA
Agency: Army
Appellant: Honeywell International, Inc.
Date: 2017-08-01
Outcome: sustained
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of -- )
)
Honeywell International, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 57779
)
Under Contract No. W911Sl-08-F-013 l )
APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Terry L. Albertson, Esq.
Robert J. Sneckenberg, Esq.
Crowell & Moring, LLP
Washington, DC
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq.
Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney
Marvin Kent Gibbs, Esq.
Senior Trial Attorney
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MELNICK
This is the quantum phase of this appeal involving a delivery order (DO) issued to
Honeywell International, Inc. (Honeywell) under an Energy Savings Performance Contract
(ESPC). Among other things, the DO required the delivery of two solar arrays. In prior
summary judgment decisions the Board invalidated the portions of the DO that had
recognized the value of Solar Renewable Energy Certificates (SRECs) associated with the
arrays' generation. SRECs could not be included among government cost savings that would
justify payment under the contract. Honeywell Int'!, Inc., ASBCA No. 57779, 13 BCA
,-i 35,380. Nevertheless, because Honeywell delivered the arrays to the government, the
Board recognized Honeywell was entitled to a quantum valebant or quantum meruit recovery
for the goods and services received by the government. Honeywell Int'!, Inc., ASBCA
No. 57779, 15-1BCA~36,121.
The Board has since held a hearing to address quantum and awards it as discussed
in the following decision.
BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS OF FACT 1
1. On 9 July 2008 the United States Army issued the DO identified above under
ESPC No. DE-AM01-99EE73683 (later renumbered DE-AM36-99EE73683) (the Super
ESPC) awarded by the Department of Energy to Honeywell. 15-1 BCA i-1 36, 121 at
176,338; 13 BCA ,-i 35,380 at 173,607. Through ESPCs, contractors provide the
1 Some of the citations are to the portions of prior summary judgment decisions finding
that the matter is not in dispute.
government with energy conservation measures (ECMs) in exchange for a share of the
government's energy savings. 42 U.S.C. § 8287. ESPCs guarantee savings to agencies
and dictate payment schedules based upon them. 42 U.S.C. § 8287(a). ESPCs may last
for a period of up to 25 years, and a multiyear ESPC is governed by FAR Part 17 .1.
42 U.S.C. § 8287(a)(l ), (a)(2)(D)(iii).
2. This DO acquired services for Fort Dix, New Jersey, with payments eventually
scheduled over 21 years (app. supp. R4, tab 2 at 9, tab 10 at 9.) 2 13 BCA ~ 35,380 at 173,607.
Relevant here are two solar arrays. The original DO's requirements have been designated
Phase I and included a roof mounted unit. The second solar array, Phase II, was added
through a modification. 15-1 BCA ~ 36, 121 at 176,338. Phase II was approximately the same
size as the Phase I unit and was to be ground mounted adjacent to a controlled humidity
warehouse building (R4, tab 16 at 4; tr. 177). Each array would produce 700 kW DC peak
production (R4, tab 16 at 3-4). All of the electricity was to be used by Fort Dix, eliminating
any need for net metering in support of its sale outside that grid (id. at 4 ).
3. The DO calculated the annual energy savings to the government resulting from
the arrays by adding the value of the electricity produced by them to the sales value of the
SRECs they generated. SRECs are transferable certificates (here issued by New Jersey)
representing the environmental benefits or attributes of one megawatt-hour of solar
energy produced by a generator connected to the state's electrical grid. Using
contractually specified values for electricity and SRECs over time, Honeywell guaranteed
certain annual savings from the ECMs. The DO then scheduled annual payments to
Honeywell from the government based upon those savings. The DO provided that
Honeywell could sell the SRECs for the government. 15-1BCA~36,121at176,338.
Honeywell understood that if the government's savings in any years were lower than
Honeywell's guarantee, Honeywell would bear the cost (tr. 30-31).
4. The Super ESPC required five previously formatted schedules to be submitted by
Honeywell for inclusion in the DO, identified as D0-1 through D0-5 (ex. B-1, tab 12
at 80-82). D0-1 lists Honeywell's Estimated Annual Cost Savings for each year, followed
by its Proposed Guaranteed Annual Cost Savings for each year and Annual Contractor
Payments.