CBCA 7832(5692)-REM
Board: CBCA
Agency: Department of Transportation
Appellant: Eagle Peak Rock & Paving, Inc.
Date: 2025-03-14
Outcome: granted
THIS OPINION WAS INITIALLY ISSUED UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER AND
IS BEING PUBLICLY RELEASED IN ITS ENTIRETY ON MARCH 26, 2025
GRANTED: March 14, 2025
CBCA 7832(5692)-REM
EAGLE PEAK ROCK & PAVING, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Respondent.
Bennett J. Lee and Stephen L. Pessagno of Varela, Lee, Metz & Guarino, LLP, San
Francisco, CA; and David B. Wonderlick of Varela, Lee, Metz & Guarino, LLP, Tysons
Corner, VA, counsel for Appellant.
Rayann L. Speakman, Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Highway Administration,
Department of Transportation, Vancouver, WA; and Milton Hsieh, Office of the Chief
Counsel, Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation, Ashburn, VA,
counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges RUSSELL, KULLBERG, and SULLIVAN.
RUSSELL, Board Judge.
This appeal is before the Board on remand from the United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit. See Department of Transportation v. Eagle Peak Rock & Paving,
Inc., 69 F.4th 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2023). The Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA or agency), awarded appellant, Eagle Peak Rock & Paving, Inc.
CBCA 7832(5692)-REM 2
(Eagle Peak), a contract to perform construction work in Yellowstone National Park. FHWA
terminated the contract for failure to prosecute the work with sufficient diligence to ensure
that the contract would be completed within the time period required by the contract.
The Board previously determined that the termination for default was improper and
converted it to one for convenience. The Federal Circuit vacated our decision, concluding
that we relied âheavily, though not exclusively, on [the Boardâs] view of deficiencies in the
contracting officerâs reasoningâ for default ârather than on de novo findings about what the
record developed in the Board proceeding showed about whether the standard for termination
for default was met.â Eagle Peak, 69 F.4th at 1371. The Federal Circuit remanded the case
âfor the Board to adjudicate the case de novo on the record before it.â Id. Based on the
record, which included a two-week hearing, the Board determines that the termination for
default was improper and converts it to one for convenience.
Findings of Fact
I. The Contract
A. Project Scope and Completion Dates
On May 2, 2016, FHWA awarded Eagle Peak a contract to make improvements along
4.7 miles of Grand Loop Road in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, as well as nearby
parking areas, trails, and overlooks. Respondentâs Final Complete Rule 4 File, Exhibit
231-10 (stipulations), ¶¶ 1, 2.1 The project consisted of four primary worksites: (1) Grand
Loop Road (also sometimes referred to as the âMainlineâ); (2) Inspiration Point; (3) Brink
of the Upper Falls; and (4) Uncle Tomâs Point. Exhibit 1 (contract) at 000002, 000009,
000020-48; Exhibit 3 at 001307, 001313. Inspiration Point, Brink of the Upper Falls, and
Uncle Tomâs Point are commonly referred to as the âCanyon Rimâ sites or areas. Exhibit
3 at 001313. The project was scheduled for three construction seasons with an overall
completion date of October 5, 2018, and an interim completion date for the Inspiration Point
work of November 15, 2017. Exhibit 1 at 000082, 000218. The winter shutdowns were
scheduled from November 11, 2016, to April 16, 2017, and from November 15, 2017, to
April 15, 2018. Id. at 000217.
The original contract had an estimated value of $28,049,200.62. Exhibit 231-10, ¶ 3.
The original base contract was referred to as âSchedule Bâ and included work on Grand
1
All exhibits are found in FHWAâs Final Complete Rule 4 appeal file, unless
otherwise noted. FHWA used âtabâ numbers to designate exhibits. The exhibit numbers
used herein correspond with the âtabâ numbers used in the appeal file.
CBCA 7832(5692)-REM 3
Loop Road at Inspiration Point and on the Brink of the Upper Falls. Id. With respect to the
Brink of the Upper Falls, the Schedule B work included rehabilitation and reconstruction of
trails and overlooks at this location. Id.
The solicitation also required Eagle Peak to submit bids for certain options, namely
options W, X, Y, and Z, which involved additional parking lot, trail, and overlook work at
the Brink of the Upper Falls and Uncle Tomâs Point sites. Exhibit 231-10, ¶ 4. FHWA
exercised these options via a unilateral modification dated July 14, 2016. Id.