CBCA 7233
Board: CBCA
Agency: Department of Justice
Appellant: CI-Pond Solutions JV, LLC
Date: 2022-03-10
Outcome: granted
GRANTED IN PART: March 10, 2022
CBCA 7233
CI-POND SOLUTIONS JV, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Respondent.
Kevin H. Hudson and Alexander J. Bell of Hudson Lambert Parrott Walker, LLC,
Atlanta, GA, counsel for Appellant.
Marc E. Mandel, Office of General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Department of Justice, Washington, DC; and Kelli Beene, Office of General Counsel,
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice, Redstone Arsenal, AL, counsel for
Respondent.
SHERIDAN, Board Judge.
Appellant, CI-Pond Solutions JV, LLC (CPS), was awarded task order
15F067-20-F-0000515 for the construction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Hazardous Devices School Fuselage Training Facility (FTF), located in Huntsville, Alabama.
The contract was a firm-fixed-price, design-build type with a value of $1,251,599.
CPS is a small business concern, and the amount in controversy is $149,551.33. It
elected to pursue the appeal under the Boardâs small claims procedure, as permitted by
section 7106(b) of the Contract Disputes Act (CDA) (41 U.S.C. § 7106(b) (2018)) and
implemented through Board Rule 52 (48 CFR 6101.52 (2020)). A decision issued under that
procedure is final and unappealable except for fraud.
CBCA 7233 2
Background
The contractâs scope of work included all management, labor, equipment, and material
necessary for design and construction of a fully operational FTF. Appeal File, Exhibit 5 at
391.1 The contractor was also responsible for site preparation, excavation, and soil
investigation. Id. Due to the restrictive nature of the facility, offerors were only permitted
a visual inspection of the site and were not allowed to take additional photographs or soil
samples. Appellantâs Reply at 4. Offerors did not receive a geotechnical report or
topographical survey. Id. The statement of work (SOW) provided a brief description of the
existing conditions at the site, including the following description of the soil: âThe local
overburden is predominantly residual red clays, with some shallow loam or gravel lenses and
deeper cherty rubble occurring above the bedrock surface.â Exhibit 5 at 395.
CPS requested, but was denied, a follow-up site visit. Complaint at 2. Offerors,
including CPS, submitted hundreds of requests for information (RFIs). See generally
Exhibit 9 at 475-515. The Government, through responses to the RFIs, informed offerors
that the soil bearing conditions, electrical requirements, and other information would be
determined during design. Id. To assist offerors in developing their proposals for building
the FTF, the Government provided reference drawings of what it considered to be a
comparable building at the site. On January 18, 2020, CPS submitted a proposal based on
these conditions.
On May 20, 2020, the parties executed the contract for design and construction of the
FTF in the amount of $1,251,599. The contract incorporated CPSâs proposal, which
indicated that it planned to use a pre-engineered building for the FTF.
The contract incorporated Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses 52.236-2,
Differing Site Conditions, and 52.243-4, Changes (48 CFR 52.236-2, .243-4). Exhibit 2 at
36, 37. The contract also included clauses appropriate for design-build contracts:
2.1 Project Description: The intent of this project is to provide all
management, labor, equipment and material necessary for design and
construction for a new Fuselage Training Facility. The government will
entertain pre-fabricated buildings. This project includes all related site
preparation and grading, utility relocation, placement, and connections,
installation of government-furnished fuselage, architectural,
telecommunications, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and fire protection
building components and system installations.
1
All exhibits are found in the appeal file, unless otherwise noted.
CBCA 7233 3
Exhibit 5 at 392.
H.14 Design Errors or Deficiencies, Inspection of Existing Work
The Contractor shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical
accuracy, and coordination of all services required under this contract.