ASBCA 60779

Board: ASBCA Agency: Army Corps of Engineers Appellant: Carter Safety Consultants, Inc. Date: 2017-02-22 Outcome: dismissed
View full appeal with AI analysis on ProtestIntel →
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- ) ) Carter Safety Consultants, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 60779 ) Under Contract No. W912P8-10-P-0255 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Ms. Cliftena Carter CEO APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. Engineer Chief Trial Attorney David R. Dyer, Esq. Engineer Trial Attorney U.S: Army Engineer District, New Orleans OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE O'CONNELL ON THE GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION The United States Army Corps of Engineers moves to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, contending that Carter Safety Consultants, Inc. (Carter) failed to file a timely appeal from the contracting officer's final decision (COFD). We grant the government's motion and dismiss the appeal. STATEMENT OF FACTS (SOF) FOR PURPOSES OF THE MOTION 1. The government and Carter entered into Contract No. W912P8-10-P-0255 (contract) on 30 September 2010 for information and project scheduling support (R4, tab 29). 2. By letter dated 8 February 2016, Carter submitted a certified claim to the contracting officer (CO) for $109,542.60 for final payment under the contract (R4, tab 5). 3. By letter dated 21 April 2016, the CO issued a final decision denying the claim (R4, tab 1). The COFD notified Carter of its right to appeal the decision to the Board within 90 days of receipt or to bring an action directly in the United States Court of Federal Claims within 12 months of receipt (id. at 22). The COFD also provided the mailing address for the Board (id.). 4. The contracting officer emailed the final decision to Carter on 21 April 2016 and also sent it by certified mail. Carter received the certified mail copy on 25 April 2016. (R4, tab 1 at 1-2) 5. By letter dated 5 August 2016, Carter appealed the COFD to the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) (R4, tab 3). The letter stated that Carter had sent its appeal to the GAO several times before, the most recent attempt having been returned to Carter's offices on 12 July 2016 (id. at 1). Carter has not provided us with copies of its earlier appeals to the GAO. 6. By letter dated 22 August 2016 (submitted in an envelope bearing a postal meter stamp of 3 September 2016 and received by the Board on 6 September 2016), Carter filed its appeal with the Board from the 21April2016 COFD. In the notice of appeal, Carter stated it received a letter on 19 August 2016 from the GAO Contract Appeals Board (CAB) in which the CAB stated that it did not possess jurisdiction to consider Carter's appeal and referred Carter to this Board. DISCUSSION The government moves to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, asserting that Carter failed to file its appeal with the Board within 90 days of receiving the COFD. In its response, Carter did not address the timeliness of its appeal but merely argued the merits of its appeal. The Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109, requires a contractor to file an appeal of a COFD with the Board within 90 days from receipt of that COFD. 41 U.S.C. § 7104. We lack jurisdiction over any appeal filed outside this 90-day appeal period. Cosmic Constr. Co. v. United States, 697 F.2d 1389, 1391 (Fed. Cir. 1982). For purposes of this motion, we will assume that Carter received the COFD on 25 April 2016 (the date that it received the certified letter) rather than 21 April 2016 (the date that the contracting officer emailed it). With a starting date of 25 April 2016, Carter's appeal had to have been filed no later than Monday, 25 July 2016. Carter did not mail a notice of appeal to the Board until at least 22 August 2016 (ignoring for the moment the 12-day gap between the date of its letter and the postal meter stamp of 3 September 2016 ), which is more than 90 days after Carter received the COFD (SOF ii 6). We have held that we possess jurisdiction under the CDA in narrow circumstances where the contractor sent a timely notice of appeal to other officials in the Department of Defense. E.g., Contraves-Goerz Corp., ASBCA No. 26317, 83-1 BCA ii 16,309 (timely notice of appeal addressed to the Secretary of the Air Force through the CO); Brunner Bau GmbH, ASBCA No. 35678, 89-1BCAii21,315 (timely notice of appeal to government counsel); Thompson Aerospace, Inc., ASBCA Nos.