CBCA 7141
Board: CBCA
Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
Appellant: ORSA Technologies, LLC
Date: 2022-01-18
Outcome: denied
DENIED: January 18, 2022
CBCA 7141
ORSA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Respondent.
John M. Manfredonia of Manfredonia Law Offices, LLC, Cresskill, NJ, counsel for
Appellant.
David G. Fagan, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Portland, OR, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges LESTER, SULLIVAN, and OâROURKE.
LESTER, Board Judge.
Appellant, ORSA Technologies, LLC (Orsa), challenges a Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) contracting officerâs decision terminating Orsaâs contract for cause, and the VA
asks the Board to enter summary judgment in its favor. Under the contract at issue, Orsa had
forty-five days after award to supply the VA with nitrile gloves that it was supposed to have
had âon handâ at the time of contract award. Orsa failed to make delivery. Orsa blames
marketplace forces caused by the COVID-19 pandemic for its inability to acquire the
necessary nitrile gloves. Because Orsa was well aware of the pandemic when it executed the
contract at issue and was supposed to have had the gloves âon handâ when it entered the
contract, it cannot use the pandemic as a cause of excusable delay. Accordingly, we grant
CBCA 7141 2
the VAâs motion for summary judgment and deny Orsaâs challenge to the termination for
cause.
Statement of Undisputed Facts
The Request for Quotes
On January 6, 2021, the VAâs Network Contracting Office 9 (90C) in Murfreesboro,
Tennessee, issued a request for quotation (RFQ) for the procurement of ânitrile gloves per
attached salient characteristics and price/delivery schedule.â Appeal File, Exhibit 2 at
VA000063.1 The RFQ, which included the âCommercial Items (Oct 2018)â clause at Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.212-4 (48 CFR 52.212-4 (2020)), specifically stated that
the VA was looking for a supplier who already had acceptable nitrile gloves on hand (rather
than a supplier who would need to have the gloves manufactured) and could deliver them
within forty-five days2 after contract award to the Defense Logistics Agency in Birmingham,
Alabama:
[Veterans Health Administration] requests Nitrile Examination Gloves as per
specifications listed below. This is not a request for manufacturing but a
request for quantity on hand to be delivered within 45 calendar days from
order.
....
Contracts that are awarded based on submitted quotes will have 45 calendar
days from receipt of order (award date) to deliver the awarded quantities, or
the contract will be terminated for cause and negative performance will be
reflected within the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System
(CPARS) and the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information
System (FAPIIS).
Id. at VA000066 (emphasis added). The RFQ further explained that, if the supplier was not
the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) of the nitrile gloves, it would have to provide
1
Unless otherwise noted, all exhibits referenced in this decision are found in the
appeal file.
2
The RFQ, as originally issued, identified a delivery deadline of thirty days after
contract award. Exhibit 1. Later the same day that it issued the RFQ, however, the VA
issued an amendment reflecting a forty-five-day deadline. Exhibit 2.
CBCA 7141 3
an authorized letter from the OEM officially designating the supplier as a distributor for the
gloves:
If the potential Authorized Supplier is not the OEM (original equipment
manufacturer), the Authorized Supplier must provide an Authorized
Distributor Letter from the OEM to the potential Supplier that is still in effect.
The Authorized Distributor Letter from the OEM shall include for each
product(s) proposed authorizing the quoter as a distributor for the proposed
products(s). The letter must either state specific product(s) proposed or that
the quoter is an authorized distributor for all the manufacturerâs products. . .