CBCA 5517
Board: CBCA
Agency: Department of Homeland Security
Appellant: Dream Management, Inc.
Date: 2017-04-20
Outcome: granted
THIS OPINION WAS INITIALLY ISSUED UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER AND
IS BEING RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC IN ITS ENTIRETY ON
APRIL 20, 2017
GRANTED IN PART: April 10, 2017
CBCA 5517
DREAM MANAGEMENT, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Respondent.
Timothy Sullivan and Jayna Marie Rust of Thompson Coburn LLP, Washington, DC,
counsel for Appellant.
Kasey Podzius, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
BEARDSLEY, Board Judge.
Appellant, Dream Management, Inc. (DMI), appealed the denial of its claim for costs
incurred in performing a language services contract for the Department of Homeland
Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Appellant asserts that the agency
breached the contract, or in the alternative, the agency terminated the contract for its
convenience. Appellant has elected to proceed under the Boardâs expedited procedure for
small claims. Rule 52 (48 CFR 6101.52 (2015)). Decisions issued under the small claims
CBCA 5517 2
procedure are final and conclusive and shall not be set aside except in cases of fraud
affecting the Boardâs proceedings. Rule 52(b); see 41 U.S.C. § 7106(b) (2012); Palmer v.
Barram, 184 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 1999). This decision has no value as precedent.
Background
Federal Supply Schedule Contract
DMI holds a Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contract (FSS contract) with the General
Services Administration (GSA), contract number GS-10F-222BA, to provide Spanish-
language translation and interpretation services. The GSA FSS contract terms and conditions
(GSA terms and conditions) contained Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause
52.212-4(l) (48 CFR 52.212-4(l) (2015)), âContract Terms and Conditions - Commercial
Items (May 2014) (Alternate I - May 2014) (Deviation I - Feb 2007).â Stipulated Facts ¶ 3.
That clause, titled âTermination for the Ordering Activityâs Convenience,â stated:
The ordering activity reserves the right to terminate this contract, or any part
hereof, for its sole convenience. In the event of such termination, the
Contractor shall immediately stop all work hereunder and shall immediately
cause any and all of its suppliers and subcontractors to cease work. Subject to
the terms of this contract, the Contractor shall be paid an amount for direct
labor hours (as defined in the Schedule of the contract) determined by
multiplying the number of direct labor hours expended before the effective
date of termination by the hourly rate(s) in the contract, less any hourly rate
payments already made to the Contractor plus reasonable charges the
Contractor can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the ordering activity using its
standard record keeping system that have resulted from the termination. The
Contractor shall not be required to comply with the cost accounting standards
or contract cost principles for this purpose. This paragraph does not give the
ordering activity any right to audit the Contractorâs records. The Contractor
shall not be paid for any work performed or costs incurred that reasonably
could have been avoided.
Exhibit 1 at 15.1 The only other clause that allowed for any type of cancellation of the
contract was a âTermination for Causeâ clause. Id. The FSS contract included a price list
for services provided, including hourly rates for Spanish-language interpretation services.
Id. at 5. The FSS contract included the following terms:
1
All exhibits are found in the appeal file, unless otherwise noted.
CBCA 5517 3
Maximum order: $1,000,000.00
Minimum order: $100.00
Id. at 2.
On April 15, 2015, ICE posted a request on GSAâs eBuy website for âKiche2 and
other indigenous language translations.â Stipulated Facts ¶ 4. Kâicheâ is an indigenous
Guatemalan dialect spoken by less than ten percent of Guatemalans. On May 14, 2015, the
agency issued a request for quotations (RFQ) and statement of work (SOW)3 to eligible
vendors. Stipulated Facts ¶ 13; Exhibit 2 at 2. The RFQ stated that â[t]he basis for award
of any resulting Task Order will be lowest price and technical acceptability, in accordance
with FAR 8.405-3 and 8.404-(d). . . .