CBCA 5626
Board: CBCA
Agency: General Services Administration
Appellant: Godwin Anagu
Date: 2017-08-03
Outcome: denied
DENIED: August 3, 2017
CBCA 5626
GODWIN ANAGU,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Godwin Anagu, pro se, Culver City, CA.
Mark Ezersky, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, San
Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent.
Before Board Judges GOODMAN, VERGILIO, and LESTER.
GOODMAN, Board Judge.
This appeal arises from a contract entered into between appellant, Godwin Anagu, and
respondent General Services Administration (GSA), when appellant placed the winning bid
on a 2009 Ford Escape (vehicle) listed on the GSA Auctions website. After taking delivery
of the vehicle, appellant filed a claim seeking to return the vehicle for a full refund in the
amount of $9600, or alternatively, a price adjustment of $2758.34 for repair costs.
Respondent’s contracting officer issued a decision denying the claim, and appellant appealed.
Respondent filed a motion to dismiss, and thereafter the parties filed additional submissions.
We treat the motion as a motion for summary relief and deny the appeal.
CBCA 5626 2
Findings of Fact
The advertisement on the GSA Auctions website specified the auctioneer, Norwalk
Auto Auction in Norwalk, California, and provided a contact name and phone number for
the auctioneer to coordinate pre-bid inspection of listed items and removal of items by the
winning bidders. Exhibit 3 at 1.1 The advertisement stated that the auction was subject to
the Fleet Terms and Conditions and the General Sale Terms and Conditions, both of which
were binding on bidders. Exhibit 3 at 1 and 7.
The relevant GSA Fleet Terms and Conditions of Sale provide:
Condition of Property
The following replaces Clause No. 2 of the General Terms and Conditions
of the Standard Form (SF) 114C: Condition of property is not warranted.
Deficiencies, when known, have been indicated in the property descriptions.
However, absence of any indicated deficiencies does not mean that none
exists. Therefore, the bidder should ascertain the condition of the item through
physical inspection. Please also reference the Inspection of Property clause.
....
Description Warranty & Refunds
The Government warrants to the original purchaser that the property listed in
the GSAAuctions.gov website will conform to its written description.
Features, characteristics, deficiencies, etc. not addressed in the description are
excluded from this warranty. GSA further cautions bidders that GSA’s written
description represents GSA’s best effort to describe the item based on the
information provided to it by the owning agency. Therefore, gross omissions
regarding the functionality of items, failures to cite major missing parts and/or
restrictions with regards to usage may occur. The Government does not
warrant the merchantability of the property or its purpose.
Exhibit 3 at 8-9. The relevant General Sale Terms and Conditions provide:
1. INSPECTION
1
All exhibits are found in the appeal file, unless otherwise noted.
CBCA 5626 3
The Bidder is invited, urged, and cautioned to inspect the property prior to
submitting a bid. Property will be available for inspection at the places and
times specified in the Invitation.
Exhibit 3 at 12.
In addition to the terms and conditions, several other notifications indicate that the
vehicle’s condition was not warranted. Both the vehicle’s auction advertisement and the Sale
Contract Purchase Receipt stated “MAY OR MAY NOT NEED REPAIRS.” Exhibit 3 at
1; Exhibit 4 at 1. Further, the Sale Contract Purchase Receipt stated “as-is.” Exhibit 4 at 1.
Lastly, an inspection report may indicate whether a vehicle may or may not need repairs.
While appellant requested an inspection report at delivery, he did not request a report prior
to placing a bid. Exhibit 14 at 6.
On August 31, 2016, appellant placed a winning bid in the amount of $9600 for the
vehicle listed on GSA Auctions. Exhibit 3 at 1, 5. Appellant did not inspect the vehicle
before placing his bid. Exhibit 12 at 6-7.
Appellant alleges that “while the bid window was open, I called the number and
person provided several times to find out when to inspect the car. The phone rang on end
[and] was not picked [up].