ASBCA 58198
Board: ASBCA
Date: 2014-01-15
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of-- )
)
Hanley Industries, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 58198
)
Under Contract Nos. N00104-03-C-K101 )
N00104-04-C-K053 )
N00104-04-C-K063 )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Ryan K. Manger, Esq.
Manger Law, LLC
St. Louis, MO
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Ronald J. Borro, Esq.
Navy Chief Trial Attorney
Tinelle S. Rose, Esq.
Trial Attorney
NAVSUP Weapons Systems Support
Mechanicsburg, P A
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MELNICK
ON GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
Hanley Industries, Inc. (Hanley or appellant), appeals under the Contract Disputes
Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109, from a deemed denial by the contracting officer
(CO) of a claim submitted 15 March 2010. Appellant seeks $480,130 in increased costs
alleged to have been incurred as a result of a constructive change under three contracts.
The government moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the claim was
submitted more than six years after the claim accrued and is, therefore, time barred under
41 U.S.C. § 7103(a)(4)(A). We deny the motion.
STATEMENT OF FACTS (SOF) FOR PURPOSES OF THE MOTION
1. This appeal concerns three firm-fixed-price contracts for the manufacture and
delivery ofMD66 CCU-44/B Impulse Cartridges and MD65 CCU-45/B Impulse
Cartridges (impulse cartridges), gas cartridges that when activated issue a measured
amount of gas which propels an object (compl. ~~ 6-9). The Department of the Navy,
Naval Inventory Control Point- Mechanicsburg (Navy) awarded Hanley Contract
No. N00104-03-C-K101 (K101) for MD66 CCU-44/B Impulse Cartridges, Contract
No. N00104-04-C-K053 (K053) for MD66 CCU-44/B Impulse Cartridges, and Contract
No. N00104-04-C-K063 (K063) for MD65 CCU-45/B Impulse Cartridges (the contracts)
(R4, tabs 6, 18, 23). K101 was awarded on 18 June 2003 (R4, tab 6).
2. Each of the contracts required the packaging for the impulse cartridges to
adhere to defined Special Packaging Instructions (SPI) identified by the letters SPI or
TPO, a number, and a set of printed instructions with drawings. K101 and K053 required
the packaging for the impulse cartridges to be in accordance with SPI 01-063-3165,
Level A, and K063 required packaging in accordance with TPO 01-063-3167, Level A.
(R4, tab 6 at 263, 266-68, tab 18 at 443, 445-4 7, tab 23 at 517 -20) The relevant
packaging requirements for all three contracts are the same.
3. Two days after the award ofK101, Mr. Ronald Jones, a marketing manager at
Hanley, emailed CO Dana McMullen to clarify the packaging requirements for the
impulse cartridges. His email stated:
Our reading of the contract Section D Packaging calls for all
cartridges to be packaged 10 per can in a 4G fiberboard box.
The Can is specified as 4.975 diameter by 2.25 height. Please
confirm and are the can dimensions inside dimensions?
(R4, tab 8) CO McMullen responded on 1 July 2003:
All cartridges are to be packaged 10 per can in a 4G
fiberboard box ....
Also, the 4.976 diameter by 2.25 height is the inside
dimensions of the can.
(R4, tab 9)
4. Section H of each contract required Hanley to submit a program plan in order
to describe the approach, resources and needs of the contractor to perform the contract
(R4, tab 6 at 275, tab 18 at 455, tab 23 at 528). The program plans were to be submitted
within 30 days of contract award pursuant to the Contract Data Requirements List
Item A008 (R4, tab 6 at 295, tab 18 at 475, tab 23 at 547). Hanley submitted its initial
program plan for K101 sometime prior to 12 September 2003 (R4, tab 10). The program
plan proposed that the Lot Acceptance Test (LAT) samples would be "commercially
packaged for shipment to the testing agency." This language appeared in a paragraph
dealing exclusively with the LAT samples. In a separate paragraph, the program plan
also stated:
Under this contract 10 rounds of CCU-44/B Impulse
Cartridges will be installed in tear strip metal cans and the lid
2
crimped and sealed to form an environmentally sealed
container.