ASBCA 62127
Board: ASBCA
Agency: Department of the Navy
Appellant: Blue Rock Structures, Inc.
Date: 2020-10-21
Outcome: denied
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of - )
)
Blue Rock Structures, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62127
)
Under Contract No. N40085-16-D-6300 )
APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Brent Hartness
President
Mr. Chris Lawson
Vice President of Construction
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.
Navy Chief Trial Attorney
Daniel J. Monahan, Esq.
Trial Attorney
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE EYESTER
ON THE GOVERNMENTâS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Blue Rock Structures, Inc. (Blue Rock or appellant) appeals a contracting officerâs
final decision (COFD) denying its claim of $73,027.34 for additional steel and 21 days of
additional time as a result of a differing site condition for the installation of translucent
roof panels on Hanger 250 at Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point, North Carolina.
The Department of the Navy (Navy or government) filed a motion for summary judgment
arguing that the appellant has failed to demonstrate any material facts in dispute to
demonstrate that a differing site condition was the sole cause of the need for additional
steel and time for installation of the panels. Appellant opposes the motion, arguing that
the existing steel in the hangar varied in straightness from the design and was insufficient
for fastening the panels. Because we find that a material fact is in dispute, the motion is
denied.
STATEMENT OF FACTS FOR PURPOSES OF THE MOTION
1. On December 18, 2015, the Navy awarded General Multiple Award
Construction Contract (MACC) No. N40085-16-D-6300 to Blue Rock (R4, tab 2 at 10,
12). 1 The purpose of the MACC was to provide a range of general construction services
that included new construction, demolition, repair, and alteration of buildings, systems
and infrastructure (R4, tab 2 at 25).
1
Citations to the Rule 4 file are to the governmentâs Bates-stamped numbers. Citations
to the briefs are to the PDF page numbers.
2. All delivery or task orders issued pursuant to the MACC were subject to the
MACCâs terms and conditions (R4, tab 2 at 44). As pertinent here, the MACC
incorporated by reference Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.233-1, DISPUTES
(May 2014); FAR 52.236-2, DIFFERING SITE CONDITIONS (APR 1984); and
FAR 52.243-4, CHANGES (JUN 2007) (R4, tab 2 at 30). FAR 52.236-2, DIFFERING
SITE CONDITIONS (APR 1984), states, in pertinent part:
(a) The Contractor shall promptly, and before the conditions
are disturbed, give a written notice to the Contracting Officer
of-
(1) Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site
which differ materially from those indicated in this
contract; or
(2) Unknown physical conditions at the site, of an
unusual nature, which differ materially from those
ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as
inhering in work of the character provided for in the
contract.
(b) The Contracting Officer shall investigate the site
conditions promptly after receiving the notice. If the
conditions do materially so differ and cause an increase or
decrease in the Contractorâs cost of, or the time required for,
performing any part of the work under this contract, whether
or not changed as a result of the conditions, an equitable
adjustment shall be made under this clause and the contract
modified in writing accordingly.
3. On October 28, 2015, the Navy issued a solicitation for repairs and
improvements to Hangar 250 to selected MACC holders, including Blue Rock (R4, tab 1
at 1-2). The solicitation included specifications and drawings for the project as
attachments (R4, tab 1 at 3).
4. On November 30, 2016, the Navy issued fixed-priced Task Order No. 0005 to
Blue Rock for $13,683,510 for repairs and improvements to Hangar 250 in accordance
with the issued solicitation, as amended (R4, tab 10 at 1260-62, 1268, tab 11). The
agency ultimately issued 13 modifications, which increased the task order award amount
to $15,533,529.08 and established a completion date of December 13, 2019 (R4, tab 31
at 1480).
2
5.