ASBCA 57733
Board: ASBCA
Date: 2013-02-14
Outcome: denied
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal ofâ )
Tiger Enterprises, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 57733
Under Contract No. N68836-07-C-0062 )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Ms. Lillian Mauldin
President
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Ronald J. Borro, Esq.
Navy Chief Trial Attorney
Russell A. Shultis, Esq.
Senior Trial Attorney
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CLARKE
This appeal was submitted by the parties on the record under Board Rule 11. The
appeal involves appellant's claim that the Navy erroneously paid contract amounts to a
bank based on an invalid assignment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to the Contract
Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109. For the reasons stated below, we deny
the appeal.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On 13 September 2007 the Navy (FISC Jacksonville, Naval Air Station, FL)
awarded Tiger Enterprises, Inc. (Tiger) Contract No. N68836-07-C-0062 (0062) for the
rental and maintenance of washers and dryers at NTTC Cony Station, Pensacola, FL
(CLIN 0001); EOD School, Eglin AFB, FL (CLIN 0002); Officer Training Command,
Pensacola, FL (CLIN 0003); and CBQ Naval Air Station, Whiting Field, Milton, FL
(CLIN 0004) (R4, tab 3 at 68-76). The total amount of the contract at award was
$109,156.44 (R4, tab 3 at 68). The contract included two option years, CLINs 0005-0008
{id. at 77-83), and CLINs 0009-0012 {id. at 84-90). The contract did not prohibit
assignments.
2. The contract indicated that payments would be made by DFAS - Cleveland
Center (R4, tab 3 at 68). Invoices were to be submitted electronically each month
through "Wide Area Work Flow - Receipt and Acceptance (WAWF)" (R4, tab 3 at 101).
3. The contract incorporated FAR 52.212-4, CONTRACT TERMS and CONDITIONS
- COMMERCIAL Items (Feb 2007) (R4, tab 3 at 94). FAR 52.212-4(b) Assignment,
includes similar1 assignment provisions included in non-commercial item contracts2:
(b) Assignment. The Contractor or its assignee may
assign its rights to receive payment due as a result of
performance of this contract to a bank, trust company, or
other financial institution, including any Federal lending
agency in accordance with the Assignment of Claims Act (31
U.S.C. 3727).
4. By Modification No. P00001, dated 27 September 2007, the performance start
date was changed from 1 October 2007 to 1 November 2007 (R4, tab 4 at 108). Option
period 1 was exercised by Modification No. P00007 for performance from 1 October
2008 through 30 September 2009 (R4, tab 10 at 141). Option period 2 was exercised by
Modification No. P00011 for performance from 1 October 2009 through 30 September
2010 (R4, tab 14 at 157). By Modification No. P00016 the contract performance period
was extended for 6 months from 1 October 2010 through 31 March 2011 (R4, tab 19
at 176).
5. The record includes a document, dated 6 February 2008, titled "CONSENT TO
ASSIGNMENT" printed on Tiger letterhead that reads in part:
This Consent, dated as of February 6, 2008, is given
and made by Tiger Enterprises, Inc. ("Vendor") in favor of
Chain Bridge Bank, N.A. ("Bank").
RECITALS
Vendor and Anderson Funding Group, Ltd., Inc.
("AFG") are parties to the Purchase Agreement, dated
December 1, 2007 (the "AFG Purchase Agreement"), and
Delivery Schedule TE-NAS-001, dated December 8, 2007
(the "Delivery Schedule"), issued by Vendor pursuant to the
Purchase Agreement. The Purchase Agreement and the
1 FAR 12.210, Contract Financing, provides, "Customary market practice for some
commercial items may include buyer contract financing.