ASBCA 62445
Board: ASBCA
Agency: Defense Logistics Agency
Appellant: Asahi General Trading & Contracting Co. W.L.L.
Date: 2020-12-18
Outcome: denied
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of -- )
)
Asahi General Trading & Cont. Co. W.L.L. ) ASBCA No. 62445
)
Under Contract No. 49065890 et al. )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Fred T. Pribble, Esq.
Valrico, FL
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq.
DLA Chief Trial Attorney
Robin E. Walters, Esq.
Michael J. Kerrigan, Esq.
Trial Attorneys
DLA Disposition Services
Battle Creek, MI
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MELNICK DENYING THE
GOVERNMENTâS MOTION TO DISQUALIFY APPELLANTâS COUNSEL
Asahi General Trading & Contracting Co. W.L.L. (Asahi) seeks compensation
arising from an alleged settlement requiring the extension of the terms of a scrap
removal agreement in Kuwait. Before we address jurisdictional or merits issues, the
government requests that we disqualify Asahiâs counsel, who is a former General
Counsel of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA). The government contends Asahiâs
counsel possesses confidential information that he would necessarily use to its
disadvantage or disclose. We deny the motion.
STATEMENT OF FACTS FOR PURPOSES OF THE MOTION
I. Asahiâs Allegations
The following allegations are taken from the relevant claims and complaint.
In July of 2015, the Defense Logistics Agency, Disposition Services (DLA-DS or
government) awarded Asahi related contracts for the removal of different types of scrap
materials in Kuwait (the Kuwait contract). Then on February 12, 2016, DLA-DS issued
related contracts for scrap removal in Qatar (the Qatar contract). 1 (Compl. ¶¶ 5, 7)
1 Presumably for ease of reference, the parties referred to each set of related contracts as
a single contract.
On October 8, 2017, Asahi submitted a certified claim to the contracting officer
for $1,347,625 allegedly due under the Qatar contract. Among other things, Asahi
claimed that, despite the governmentâs promise that its defense cooperation agreement
with Qatar authorized Asahi to purchase and resell scrap domestically, Qatar customs
officials delayed and obstructed its removal, while also barring resale of some of the
scrap within the country. Asahi suggested the government was contractually
responsible for the customs officialsâ acts. Asahi also alleged that the government had
previously encountered problems with Qatarâs customs officials and did not disclose
those facts. (R4, tab 11; compl. ¶ 7)
In July of 2018, the parties settled the Qatar contract claim. Asahi promised to
withdraw the claim in return for an extension of the Kuwait contractâs performance
period (compl. ¶¶ 9-15). The parties agreed the new Kuwait extension would provide
Asahi with sufficient business to cover its Qatar contract losses (compl. ¶¶ 11, 13).
Later in July, the contracting officer notified Asahi that the Kuwait contract had not
been extended because the settlement was not approved by government lawyers
(compl. ¶ 16). In September of 2018, the parties resumed settlement discussions.
At that time, the contracting officerâs counsel refused Asahiâs request for a three year
extension of the Kuwait contract, countering with an offer of six months. The
government assured Asahi that more than sufficient scrap would be generated to
compensate Asahi for the Qatar claim. (Compl. ¶ 22) On September 20, 2018, the
parties entered another settlement agreement. Again Asahi dropped its Qatar contract
claim in return for a six month extension of the Kuwait contract. (Compl. ¶ 24)
The government did not provide Asahi with the volume of scrap Asahi expected
during the Kuwait contract extension (compl. ¶ 27). In February of 2019, the government
unilaterally extended the Kuwait contract again for four more months (compl. ¶ 28).
Nevertheless, the volume of scrap remained below Asahiâs expectations (compl. ¶ 30).
Asahi requested a third extension of the Kuwait contract but that was denied. The
government told Asahi that a new scrap contract for Kuwait would be awarded to another
contractor, Royal Bridge International (RBI), in settlement of a claim brought by that
company upon a Qatar scrap contract awarded to it in 2014. (Compl. ¶ 31)
On September 11, 2019, Asahi submitted another certified claim.