ASBCA 58856
Board: ASBCA
Date: 2015-02-20
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeals of -- )
)
ECC International LLC ) ASBCA No. 58856
)
Under Contract No. W912DQ-11-C-4009 )
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: R. Dale Holmes, Esq.
Amy M. Kirby, Esq.
Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall &
Furman PC
Philadelphia, PA
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.
Engineer Chief Trial Attorney
Daniel B. McConnell, Esq.
Geoffrey A. Mueller, Esq.
Regina L. Schowalter, Esq.
Engineer Trial Attorneys
U.S. Army Engineer District,
Middle East
Winchester, VA
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE O'SULLIVAN
ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
This appeal arises from a dispute between the parties over whether the contract
required appellant to construct a vehicle refueling point (VRP) as part of the
construction of a Military Police School at Camp Shaheen, Afghanistan. The
government has moved for summary judgment on this issue. Appellant opposes the
government's motion and has cross-moved for summary judgment. For the reasons
stated below, we deny both parties' motions.
STATEMENT OF FACTS (SOF) FOR PURPOSES OF THE MOTIONS
1. On 24 February 2011, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued Solicitation
No. W912DQ-l l-R-4014 for the design and construction of the Afghan National
Army Military Police and Personal Security Training School (MP School) and the
Signal Training School (Signal School) at Camp Shaheen, Balkh Province,
1
Afghanistan (Government's Statement of Undisputed Facts (gov't stmt.) ii 1.)
2. The solicitation contemplated a firm-fixed-price contract with four contract
line item numbers (CLINs): one for design and construction of the MP School, one for
design and construction of the Signal School, and two for Defense Base Act insurance
applicable to each project (gov't stmt. ii 2).
3. CLIN 0001, for the MP School, states:
The contractor shall provide all Manpower, Materials,
Equipment, and Coordination to the Design/Construction
of Military Police and Personal Security Training School
in accordance to the attached specifications. [See] PRICE
2
PROPOSAL SCHEDULE Military School. r l
CLIN 0001 provided a single line for insertion of a lump sum firm fixed price for the
entire MP School project. (R4, tab 4 at 39)
4. The solicitation included a price proposal schedule for the MP School and a
price proposal schedule for the Signal School. The price proposal schedule for the MP
School was broken out by subCLINs (OOOlAl, 0001B2, etc.) that called out most, but
not all, of the items of work contained in the specifications referenced in CLIN 0001.
(Gov't stmt. ilil 3, 7; R4, tab 4 at 41-42)
5. The price proposal schedules contained the following statement at the top of
the first page: "This Price Proposal Schedule is information supplemental to the CLIN
and is not part of the contract" (R4, tab 4 at 41 ). The price proposal schedules also
contained the following "PROPOSAL SCHEDULE NOTES" on the second page,
following the list of bid items:
1
The government has filed a statement of undisputed facts in connection with its
motion. Appellant has indicated where it agrees and where it does not agree
with the government's statement. Along with its opposition, appellant has also
filed a statement of undisputed facts, to which the government has not
responded. References in this opinion to either document will be to those
paragraphs that are not disputed.
2
By reference to CLIN 0003 for the Signal School, the word "See" was probably
intended to precede the words "PRICE PROPOSAL SCHEDULE" in CLIN
0001, but was inadvertently omitted.
2
1. Offeror shall submit prices on all items. Scope of work
on each items [sic] are [sic] described in Section 01010
and 01015 [the specifications].
2.