[Letter]
Case: B-258357
Agency: Department of Agriculture : Forest Service
Protester: [Letter]
Date: 1996-01-03
Appropriations Law
[Letter]
BNUMBER: B-258357
DATE: January 3, 1996
TITLE: [Letter]
**********************************************************************
B-258357
January 3, 1996
Mr. Darold D. Foxworthy
Authorized Certifying Officer
Washington Office, Forest Service
Department of Agriculture
Dear Mr Foxworthy:
In your letter of August 26, 1994, you requested that imprest fund
cashier Bonnie J. Luckman "be relieved of the responsibility to
reimburse" her imprest fund for a shortage that resulted from the
physical loss of subvouchers from the fund. You indicated that Ms.
Luckman had been billed for the loss because United States Department
of Agriculture (USDA) "was unable to show that she was not negligent"
in the loss of the subvouchers. You further stated that you believed
"that the government has not sustained a monetary loss but a loss of
documenation." You conclude that "it would not be in the best
interest of the government or in good conscience" to require Ms.
Luckman to repay her imprest fund shortage because the government did
not sustain an actual monetary loss.
For the reasons indicated below, we are unable to free Ms. Luckman of
the responsiblity to repay the shortage in her imprest fund. Further,
because USDA has been unable to find that the shortage was not the
result of Ms. Luckman's fault or negligence, we are unable to relieve
her of liablity under 31 U.S.C. 3527(a).
Background
On August 14, 1992, Bonnie Luckman, imprest fund cashier at the
supervisor's office, Sawtooth National Forest, Twin Falls, Idaho,
reported the loss of a blue folder containing subvouchers (receipts)
that she was processing for payment to the National Finance Center.
The folder also contained a cashier subvoucher register, which Ms.
Luckman had been using as a subvoucher log to permit reconstructing
the file in case of loss. Ms. Luckman indicated that at the time the
folder disappeared she had been carrying it with her during a fire
situation at the forest awaiting an opportunity to complete reporting
payments. An extended search over more than two months failed to
locate the folder.
Ms. Luckman has indicated that the subvouchers represented purchases
that she made for the national forest. However, because her
subvoucher log as well as the subvouchers were lost, Ms. Luckman's
attempt to reconstruct her account proved unsuccessful. She was only
able to identify a small proportion of the purchases she made.
Further, although Forest Service budget and accounting officer Jerry
Gibbons indicates that he saw the subvouchers and the subvoucher log
in the folder, he apparently cannot verify the amounts and the payees
represented by the subvouchers.
A Forest Service investigation indicated there was a shortage of
$1,967.81 in Ms. Luckman's account. On February 22, 1994, the
Forest Service determined that Ms. Luckman was responsible for paying
back the shortage in her account.
Discussion
Government accountable officers, including imprest fund cashiers, are
insurers of the public funds in their custody and are strictly liable
for any losses of those funds. 48 Comp. Gen. 566 (1969). This Office
may relieve an accountable officer of liability for a loss if we agree
with the determination by the head of an agency that (1) the officer
was carrying out official duties when the loss occurred, and (2) the
loss was not the result of fault or negligence by the officer. 31
U.S.C. 3527(a).
As we indicated above, however, you are not requesting that we relieve
Ms. Luckman of liablity under 31 U.S.C. 3527(a). Rather, you are
requesting that we determine that she is not liable because you say
the government sustained no loss. We cannot grant your request.
A cashier must fully account for the money with which he or she has
been entrusted. See 4 Treasury Financial Manual 3040.80. If the
cashier has made cash payments from an imprest fund he or she must
have sales slips, invoices or some other receipts to support those
payments. Id. [1] Without some documentary evidence to support
payments from the fund, an unexplained shortage exists in the fund.
The USDA investigation indicates that there is a shortage of $1,967.81
in Ms. Luckman's imprest fund. Although Ms. Luckman claims
that she spent all the missing money purchasing items for the Forest
Service and that the Forest Service received these items, she has no
documentation to support her assertion. She is unable to reconstruct
her account to establish any record of purchases with the missing
money. She is liable for the shortage in her account and we have no
authority to free her of that liability. Moreover, since USDA has not
(and apparently cannot) determine that the loss in her account did not
result from Ms. Luckman's fault or negligence, we cannot relieve her
under 31 U.S.C. 3527(a).
Sincerely yours,
Gary L.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...