Funding of Maintenance Contract Extending Beyond Fiscal
Case: B-259274
Agency: Department of Defense
Protester: Funding of Maintenance Contract Extending Beyond Fiscal
Date: 1996-05-22
Unknown
B-259274
May 22, 1996
Jump To
VIEW DECISION
RELATED PAGES
GAO CONTACTS
Highlights
Provides that funds appropriated to Department of Defense for a fiscal year are available for payments under maintenance contracts for 12 months beginning at any time during the fiscal year. Kelly Air Force Base may award two vehicle maintenance contracts charging fiscal year 1994 money for each contract so long as each contract is properly awarded in fiscal year 1994 and each contract does not exceed 12 months in duration. Is a statutory exception to the bona fide needs rule. Because severable services contracts are funded out of funds current at the time services are provided unless otherwise authorized by law. Because fiscal year 1994 budget authority was only available to finance performance through the first 4 months.
View Decision
Matter of: Funding of Maintenance Contract Extending Beyond Fiscal Year File: B-259274 Date: May 22, 1996
Section 2410a of title 10, U.S. Code, provides that funds appropriated to Department of Defense for a fiscal year are available for payments under maintenance contracts for 12 months beginning at any time during the fiscal year. Kelly Air Force Base may award two vehicle maintenance contracts charging fiscal year 1994 money for each contract so long as each contract is properly awarded in fiscal year 1994 and each contract does not exceed 12 months in duration. Section 2410a of title 10, U.S. Code, is a statutory exception to the bona fide needs rule. The statute authorizes the Department of Defense to use current fiscal year budget authority to finance a severable service contract for equipment maintenance that continues into the next fiscal year. Air Force decision to leave 8 months of a 12-month severable service contract unfunded at the time of award does not violate the Antideficiency Act because of Availability of Funds clause in the contract. Nor did the Air Force decision violate the bona fide needs rule, because severable services contracts are funded out of funds current at the time services are provided unless otherwise authorized by law.
DECISION
During the third option year of a fixed price contract for vehicle maintenance services, Kelly Air Force Base modified the contract period so that the contract would expire on August 31, 1994. Kelly Air Force Base exercised a fourth option to extend performance from September 1, 1994 to August 31, 1995. Because fiscal year 1994 budget authority was only available to finance performance through the first 4 months, that is, until December 31, 1995, the Air Force modified the contract to provide that after that date, the government's obligation under the contract was contingent upon the contracting officer notifying the contractor in writing that funds were available for continued performance and that the contractor continue work.
A certifying officer at the Kelly Air Force Base asks whether the use of fiscal year 1994 budget authority to finance both the initial 11 months of orders covered by the third option period and the 4 months of orders covered by the fourth option period violates 10 U.S.C. Sec. 2410a and the bona fide needs rule. There is also implicit in the facts and circumstances of this case a second question, namely, did the Air Force's failure to fund at the time of award the remaining 8 months of the contract violate the Antideficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. Sec. 1341(a)(1)(B). For the reasons discussed below, we have no objection to the Air Force's financing of the contracts.
Background
According to the Air Force, in an effort to minimize the surge in workload at the end of the fiscal year, it has staggered contract periods for certain support service contracts, including this one, so that the contracts do not all expire simultaneously. The Air Force awarded the vehicle maintenance contract here, a fixed price contract with K&M Maintenance Services, Inc., in 1990 for fiscal year 1991, with four 1-year option periods. During the third option year, the Air Force modified the contract period, cutting it short by 1 month for that year, so that the contract would expire on August 31 instead of September 30. The Air Force correspondingly changed the fourth option period to run from September 1, 1994 to August 31, 1995. At the time of exercise of the fourth 1-year option, the Air Force only had fiscal year 1994 budget authority available to finance the first 4 months of the new contract (September through December 1994). Accordingly, the Air Force modified the contract by adding a clause stating that the government's obligation beyond December 31, 1994, was contingent upon the availability of appropriations.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...