HHI Corporation
Case: B-266041
Agency:
Protester: HHI Corporation
Date: 1996-01-25
Denied
HHI Corporation
BNUMBER: B-266041; B-266041.2
DATE: January 25, 1996
TITLE: HHI Corporation
**********************************************************************
Matter of:HHI Corporation
File: B-266041; B-266041.2
Date: January 25, 1996
Jack W. Reed, Esq., Peterson, Reed, L.L.C., for the protester.
Vera Meza, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
Mary G. Curcio, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
Protest that agency improperly relaxed requirements--(1) that offered
demisters have emissions certification at time of proposal submission,
and (2) that manufacturer has had demisters of similar capacity in
operation for 5 years--by accepting for award a demister that does not
meet these requirements, is denied where protester has not established
competitive prejudice as a result of the waiver.
DECISION
HHI Corporation protests the award of a contract to D.L. McLaughlin
Co., Inc., under request for proposals (RFP) No. DAAC01-95-R-0015,
issued by the Department of the Army for the repair of two chrome line
ventilation systems. HHI asserts that McLaughlin's offered system did
not meet the material requirements of the solicitation.
We deny the protest.
Offerors were required to supply two demisters, one with a capacity of
22,500 cubic feet per minute (cfm) and a second with a capacity of
56,000 cfm. After receiving and evaluating best and final offers, the
Army awarded the contract to McLaughlin as the lowest-priced,
technically acceptable offeror. (McLaughlin's price was $866,231;
HHI's was $973,343.)
The solicitation required offerors to furnish with their offers
technical literature to show that the demister used for the
ventilation system and all component parts met or exceeded specified
federal and California state emission standards. The solicitation
further stated that proof of compliance was either the label or
listing of the Environmental Protection Agency or cognizant California
agency, or a written certificate from any approved, nationally
recognized testing organization. The solicitation also required
offerors to submit proof that demisters of capacity similar to that
specified in the RFP had been installed by the manufacturer or its
representative, and had been in satisfactory use for at least 5 years
prior to the proposal closing date.
McLaughlin offered demisters manufactured by KCH Services, Inc. HHI
maintains that McLaughlin did not submit proof that the KCH demisters
met the emission standards or that there were KCH demisters with a
56,000 cfm capacity that had been installed for 5 years.[1] HHI
concludes that the Army improperly waived material requirements in
awarding the contract to McLaughlin, and that the award therefore was
improper.
In response, the Army states that, while McLaughlin did not furnish
the proof of compliance with the emission standards with its proposal,
the firm will be required to supply this proof of compliance at the
time of delivery. The Army further states that McLaughlin has
submitted information showing that KCH chrome mist eliminator systems
with capacities of 120,000 cfms and 80,917 cfms had been installed for
Aviall Incorporated and National Hand Tool, respectively, at least 5
years ago.
It appears that McLaughlin's system did not meet the two requirements.
McLaughlin has not submitted the required proof of compliance with
emission standards, and the agency's decision to permit McLaughlin to
comply at the time of delivery constitutes a relaxation of the
requirement. Similarly, while the overall systems installed at Aviall
and National Hand Tool are 120,000 and 80,917 cfm, it appears that
none of the individual demisters installed at Aviall has a capacity
greater than 20,000 cfm, and that none of the demisters installed at
National Hand Tool has a capacity greater than 25,000 cfm. In this
regard, despite being given the opportunity to do so, neither the
Army, KCH, nor McLaughlin has disputed HHI's argument along these
lines and, following a conference call with representatives of our
Office, the protester, the agency, the awardee, and KCH, KCH
acknowledged that the Aviall and National Hand Tool projects are
comprised of a number of demisters of varying capacity, none of which
has a capacity of 56,000 cfm.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...