Vietnamese Claims (Claim of Mr. Gia Huu Pham and related cases
Case: B-270008
Agency: Central Intelligence Agency
Protester: Vietnamese Claims (Claim of Mr. Gia Huu Pham and related cases
Date: 1995-11-20
Denied
Vietnamese Claims (Claim of Mr. Gia Huu Pham and related cases
BNUMBER: B-270008-O.M.
DATE: November 20, 1995
TITLE: Vietnamese Claims (Claim of Mr. Gia Huu Pham and related cases
**********************************************************************
Date: November 20, 1995
To: Director of Adjudication, PTLD-Sharon S. Green
From: Associate General Counsel-Lowell Dodge
Subject:Vietnamese Claims (Claim of Mr. Gia Huu Pham and related
cases)-B-270008-O.M.
This is in response to your request for guidance in your memorandum to
the General Counsel dated September 29, 1995, concerning several pay
claims of former foreign national employees arising from their service
to the United States in the former Republic of Vietnam in 1975. In
many cases, these former employees were unable to leave the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam until relatively recently and have been lawfully
admitted to the United States under the Department of State's Orderly
Departure Program. They now seek final compensation, usually for one
or two pay periods in April 1975, severance pay, or other benefits.
In one case you present, copies of official National Archives and
Records Administration records show that Mr. Gia Huu Pham was employed
by the United States government from November 13, 1961, until the Navy
separated him by a reduction-in-force action, effective April 30,
1975. However, while he was at work on April 28, 1975, acting under
the orders of his last supervisor, Mr. John F. Smekal, he was struck
by a stray bullet and had to be hospitalized. By the time he
recovered, the People's Democratic Republic of Vietnam (now the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam) had taken control, and he alleges that
he did not receive compensation for the last pay period and severance
pay to which he was then legally entitled. After imprisonment and
other difficulties, he was lawfully admitted to the United States
under the Department of State's Orderly Departure Program in October
1991.
Mr. Pham filed his claim with the agency by letter dated February 1,
1992. The agency denied the claim on the ground it was barred by the
applicable statute of limitations.
Summary
As a general rule, claims arising from the evacuation of Vietnam in
1975 are barred under the 6-year statute of limitations in 31 U.S.C.
3702(b). One exception to this rule is established by law.[1] To
meet the exception, an employee must show: (1) that a payment that
would otherwise have been transmitted to the employee was withheld
under 31 C.F.R. 211.1 (1994); and (2) that either (a) the payment
was placed in a "special deposit account" and held in trust for the
employee
(31 U.S.C. 3329(b)(4)), or (b) if the alternative procedures
described in the Treasury Financial Manual (Volume 1, Section
4-2085.10) were followed, the amount of the payment has been
established as a liability on the books of the employing agency for
the benefit of the employee. The requirements for meeting this
exception are to be strictly construed. Only if these requirements
are met may the employing agency entertain such a claim.
Explanation
Title 31 U.S.C. 3329(a) (1988) requires the Secretary of the
Treasury to prohibit any checks which are, or will be drawn on public
money from being sent to an individual payee in a foreign country if
the Secretary determines that the postal, transportation, banking, or
other conditions in that country do not reasonably ensure that the
payee will receive the check and be able to negotiate it for full
value.[2] The statute provides a mechanism to accomplish its
objectives. See 31 U.S.C. 3329(b)(3) (1988). It also authorizes
the Secretary of the Treasury to "otherwise direct," that is, to
establish alternate mechanisms. This the Secretary has done. It is
the alternate method that is relevant here. We proceed to briefly
describe it.
Under 31 U.S.C. 3329(b)(3) (1988) the Secretary of the Treasury has
promulgated regulations which "otherwise direct" the drawer i.e., a
government department or agency, as to what to do with money owed to
payees in restricted foreign countries. By Treasury Department
Circular No. 655, revised November 14, 1964, the Secretary of the
Treasury authorized the second method, and the first method was
superseded. Our decision, Xie Qianhao, 70 Comp. Gen. 612, 614 (1991)
describes the alternate method as follows.
"In lieu of writing checks payable to individuals in the
restricted countries designated by the Secretary of the
Treasury (and set forth at 31 C.F.R. 211) and depositing
them in the special deposit trust fund authorized by 31 U.S.C.
3329, the Treasury Department has adopted an alternative
procedure that is less burdensome administratively but which
accomplishes the same objective as the statute.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...