[Letter]

Case: B-271612 Agency: Department of State Protester: [Letter] Date: 1997-01-30 Other
View full decision with AI analysis on ProtestIntel →
B-271612 Jan 30, 1997 Jump To VIEW DECISION DOWNLOADS RELATED PAGES GAO CONTACTS Highlights The Department of Defense (DOD) requested on opinion on whether the statutes governing educational travel of student dependents of service members and civilian employees may be construed to authorize a change in the regulations to permit temporary storage or shipment of their unaccompanied baggage to an alternate location in lieu of shipment to and from an overseas location. GAO noted that DOD regulations could not be changed to authorize storage of a student dependent's unaccompanied baggage or permit shipment of it to an alternate location in the United States, since: (1) the statutes focus on the cost of transporting unaccompanied baggage in conjunction with a student's trip overseas; (2) such a change would not be consistent with State Department regulations that are based on a related statute; and (3) there is no specific legislative authority to permit such regulatory changes. View Decision B-271612 January 30, 1997 In 64 Comp.Gen. 319 (1985), we held that the statutes authorizing payment of a transportation allowance in connection with the educational travel of student dependents of service members and civilian employees stationed overseas, 37 U.S.C. Sec. 430 and 5 U.S.C. Sec. 5924(4)(B) (1994), may permit reimbursement for the transportation of the student's unaccompanied baggage to and from the overseas location. However, the Chairman of the Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee, Department of Defense (DOD), is advised of our opinion that, in the absence of specific legislative authority, DOD's regulations may not be changed to authorize temporary storage of a student dependent's baggage or shipment of it to an alternate location in the United States. Lieutenant General Samuel E. Ebbesen, USA Chairman, Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee Department of Defense Hoffman Building 1, Room 836 2461 Eisenhower Avenue Alexandria, Virginia 22331-1300 Dear General Ebbesen: This responds to your letter dated March 1, 1996, in which you ask our opinion as to whether the statutes governing educational travel of student dependents of service members and civilian employees may be construed to authorize a change in the regulations to permit temporary storage or shipment of their unaccompanied baggage to an alternate location in lieu of shipment to and from an overseas location. In our opinion, the statutes involved would have to be amended to so permit. Paragraph U5243-A5 of the Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR), and paragraph C2306 of the Joint Travel Regulations (JTR), provide for shipment of unaccompanied baggage of student dependents of uniform members and Department of Defense (DOD) civilian employees who perform educational travel to and from an overseas residence. The JFTR provisions are authorized by 37 U.S.C. Sec. 430 (1994) and the JTR provisions are based on section 285.1 of the State Department's Standardized Regulations (Government Civilians, Foreign Areas), which, in turn, is authorized by 5 U.S.C. Sec. 5924(4)(B) (1994). You point out that under the above provisions, which are based upon 64 Comp.Gen. 319 (1985), a student dependent may transport unaccompanied baggage containing the items the student needs at college. This is to insure that students with parents at overseas locations are not disadvantaged in comparison with students whose parents live in the United States and who can move the necessary items to and from school in vehicles and store the items at home during school breaks. However, it has been determined that occasionally by the time the items shipped overseas arrive there, it is time for the student dependent to return to school. Also, the student dependent may not have a need for the items to be shipped back overseas because they duplicate items already available in the family's home. As a result, the government often incurs transportation expenses merely to satisfy the college requirement that the student vacate his dormitory room during the summer recess or other school break. You point out, however, that neither our decision nor the cited regulations provide for the temporary storage of these goods in lieu of shipping them to and from the overseas residence. Section 430 of title 37, United States Code (1994), provides that a member of the uniformed services, who is accompanied by dependents while assigned to a permanent duty station outside the United States and who has an unmarried dependent under age 23 pursuing a secondary or undergraduate college education in the United States, may be paid a transportation allowance for each such dependent for one annual round trip, either as transportation in kind or reimbursement therefor. Similar language is contained in 5 U.S.C. Sec. 5924(4)(B) (1994) governing civilian employees. In decision 64 Comp.Gen.

Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...