New Breed Leasing Corporation
Case: B-274201
Agency:
Protester: New Breed Leasing Corporation
Date: 1996-11-26
Sustained
New Breed Leasing Corporation
BNUMBER: B-274201; B-274202
DATE: November 26, 1996
TITLE: New Breed Leasing Corporation
**********************************************************************
Matter of:New Breed Leasing Corporation
File: B-274201; B-274202
Date:November 26, 1996
Matthew A. Simchak, Esq., Philip J. Davis, Esq., and Phillip H.
Harrington, Esq., Wiley, Rein & Fielding, for the protester.
William E. Franczek, Esq., Vandeventer, Black, Meredith & Martin, an
intervenor.
Dana N. Smith, Esq., and Anita D. Polen, Esq., Department of the Navy,
for the agency.
Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Paul Lieberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
Protests are sustained where agency's failure to recognize and correct
obvious flaws in prior solicitations and contracts constituted lack of
advance planning which precluded meaningful competition for
requirements and resulted in sole source extensions of concededly
flawed contracts with the incumbent contractor.
DECISION
New Breed Leasing Corporation protests the Department of the Navy's
cancellation of solicitation Nos. N00189-94-R-0304 and
N00189-94-R-0315 (hereinafter "R-0304" and "R-0315") for material
handling and logistics support services at various sites throughout
the world,[1] and the sole source extensions of contract Nos.
N-00189-94-D-0003 and N-00189-94-D-0006 (hereinafter "D-0003" and
"D-0006") for those services. The solicitations were issued as small
business set-asides; the incumbent contractor, Management Consulting,
Inc. (Mancon) is a large business, not eligible to compete under the
canceled solicitations. New Breed maintains there is no rational
basis for the cancellation of the solicitations or for the sole source
extensions of Mancon's contracts, and that the agency's actions
resulted from a lack of advance planning.
We sustain the protests on the basis that the agency's actions
resulted from a lack of advance planning.
BACKGROUND
The requirements at issue are sought by the Department of the Navy's
Fitting Out and Supply Support Assistance Center (FOSSAC), which
provides logistical and material support services to the Department of
Defense (DOD) and other federal agencies throughout the world under
the Intra-Fleet Supply Support Operations Program (ISSOP).[2]
Mancon's contracts were awarded in October 1993, for a base year with
2 option year periods extending through September 30, 1996. On July
5, 1994, FOSSAC submitted requisitions to the Fleet and Industrial
Supply Center (FISC), Norfolk Acquisition Group to initiate follow-on
procurements for the ISSOP support provided under Mancon's contracts.
The requirements for the east coast solicitation (RFP No. R-0304) and
west coast solicitation (RFP No. R-0315) were synopsized in the
Commerce Business Daily (CBD) on September 5 and 6, 1994,
respectively. Acquisition plans were approved approximately 7 months
later, on April 25 and June 6, 1995, respectively; the two
solicitations were subsequently issued in June of 1995.
Each solicitation contained a total of 112 contract line item numbers
(CLINs), broken down into 75 firm, fixed-price CLINs, 26
time-and-materials CLINs, and
11 direct reimbursement CLINs. Each CLIN had sub-CLINs for the
specific sites to be serviced.[3] For each of the 75 fixed-price
CLINs, offerors were required to propose fixed prices, reflecting
differing labor rate mixes, for the performance of various tasks.[4]
The solicitation provided for award on the basis of the low-priced,
technically acceptable offer. Solicitation No. R-0304 was amended
three times and solicitation No. R-0315 was amended twice. None of
the solicitation amendments significantly altered the description of
tasks to be performed and, as amended, solicitation Nos. R-0304 and
R-0315 required that proposals be submitted by September 21, and
October 5, 1995, respectively.
Four offerors, including New Breed, timely submitted proposals for
both solicitations which were subsequently evaluated by FISC Norfolk
personnel. Technical evaluation of proposals under both solicitations
was completed by November 17, 1995; all four proposals were determined
to be technically acceptable. Evaluation of cost/price proposals
under RFP No. R-0304 was completed in March 1996, and for proposals
under RFP No. R-0315, in June 1996. By memoranda dated April 16 and
July 10, FISC Norfolk personnel sought authority from Headquarters,
Naval Supply Systems Command (NAVSUP), to proceed with the procurement
by conducting discussions with all offerors. The memoranda stated
that the evaluators had found significant disparities in prices among
offerors, noting that the disparities were particularly prevalent
among the 75 fixed-price CLINs.
On July 30, NAVSUP personnel met with FISC Norfolk personnel to
discuss concerns regarding the procurement.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...