American Consulting Services, Inc., B-276149.2; B-276537.2,
Case: B-276149.2
Agency:
Protester: American Consulting Services, Inc., B
Date: 1997-07-31
Denied
American Consulting Services, Inc., B-276149.2; B-276537.2,
BNUMBER: B-276149.2; B-276537.2
DATE: July 31, 1997
TITLE: American Consulting Services, Inc., B-276149.2; B-276537.2,
July 31, 1997
**********************************************************************
Matter of:American Consulting Services, Inc.
File: B-276149.2; B-276537.2
Date:July 31, 1997
Terrence M. O'Connor, Esq., and Shirley Maznicki, for the protester.
Thomas J. Duffy, Esq., Captain Philip T. McCaffrey and John F. Guckert
Jr., Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
Karin L. Genis, Esq., for the Small Business Administration.
Behn Miller, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
1. Protest challenging post-bid opening cancellation of invitation
for bids on ground that cancellation was prompted solely by
contracting agency's bad faith intent to avoid awarding a contract to
the protester is denied where there is no evidence of such bad faith
and where the canceled solicitation did not reflect the contracting
agency's minimum needs.
2. Protest that contracting agency transferred its requirement for
remedial education services to the Small Business Administration's
(SBA) section 8(a) contracting program in a bad faith attempt to avoid
continued performance under a small business set-aside contract
previously awarded to the protester and in retaliation for filing of a
protest is denied where record shows that: (1) significantly higher
testing success rate and independent research at other Army
installations convinced the contracting activity to convert the
current instructor/classroom requirement to an automated tutorial
program; (2) agency's decision to convert the procurement from an
instructor/classroom format to an automated tutorial program was made
several months prior to the contractor's current protest challenging
cancellation of another educational services solicitation; and (3) the
contracting agency properly classified the offered procurement as a
new requirement.
DECISION
American Consulting Services, Inc. (ACS) protests the Department of
the Army's cancellation of invitation for bids (IFB) No.
DAKF36-97-B-0002, for certification and accreditation of the Primary
Leadership Development Course (PLDC) at the Fort Drum, New York,
Noncommissioned Officer's (NCO) Academy. ACS was the apparent low
bidder under the canceled IFB. ACS also protests the failure of the
Army to exercise the final option of its remedial education services
contract, No. DAKF36-94-D-0015, and the transfer of this requirement
to the Small Business Administration's (SBA) section 8(a) program.
ACS contends that both the IFB cancellation and the transfer of the
remedial education services requirement to the section 8(a) program
reflect a bad faith attempt by the Army to avoid contract awards to
ACS. Because both protests arise from the same allegation of bad
faith, we address them in one decision.
We deny the protests.
BACKGROUND
The PLDC IFB was issued on October 17, 1995, and contemplated the
award of a firm, fixed-price contract for "all personnel, equipment
and materials . . . to perform all services necessary to certify and
accredit" the PLDC course for "6 [college] credit hours per student."
Of significance to this protest, the IFB identified each PLDC
"session" or "class" as being comprised of "approximately 80
students"; bidders were also advised that "approximately 18 contact
hours are available to the contractor during the PLDC" to provide the
supplemental instruction necessary to obtain the required college
accreditation. Originally, the IFB had limited competition to
accredited colleges and universities; however, on November 15, the
Army issued an amendment which expanded competition to include
business concerns--such as ACS--which were "able to obtain the
services of one fully accredited college or university."
At the November 26 bid opening, only two bids were submitted. ACS was
the apparent low bidder ($172,800); Jefferson Community College
(JCC)--the incumbent for the PLDC requirement--submitted the second
lowest-priced bid ($205,632). Shortly after bid opening, the contract
specialist contacted ACS and asked for verification of its bid price;
the specialist also asked ACS to identify the name of the college with
which it would be subcontracting, and to provide several contract
references. Despite several rounds of facsimile correspondence
between the contract specialist and ACS, the Army never received any
evidence from ACS regarding its university or college arrangements for
the PLDC course.
Since August 1994, ACS had been performing a different contract for
remedial education services--referred to as the "FAST [Functional
Academic Skills Training] requirement"--at Fort Drum.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...