Ervin and Associates, Inc., B-279083; B-279219, April 30,
Case: B-279083
Agency:
Protester: Ervin and Associates, Inc., B
Date: 1998-04-30
Denied
Ervin and Associates, Inc., B-279083; B-279219, April 30,
BNUMBER: B-279083; B-279219
DATE: April 30, 1998
TITLE: Ervin and Associates, Inc., B-279083; B-279219, April 30,
1998
**********************************************************************
Matter of:Ervin and Associates, Inc.
File: B-279083; B-279219
Date:April 30, 1998
John J. Ervin for the protester.
Michael J. Farley, Esq., Department of Housing and Urban Development,
for the agency.
Tania L. Calhoun, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
1. Protests that task orders improperly exceed the scope of the
contracts originally awarded are denied; since relevant language in
the solicitation's statement of work sets forth the anticipated
services in broad, general, and flexible terms, potential offerors
would reasonably have anticipated being asked to perform nearly any
type of management support services, including those set forth in
these task orders.
2. General Accounting Office declines to invoke the significant issue
exception to its timeliness rules where there has recently been a
change to the legal framework applicable to the issue presented--the
alleged overbreadth of the statement of work in a solicitation for an
indefinite-quantity task order contract; as a result, resolution of
the issue would have limited application to future procurements and
thus is not of widespread interest to the procurement community.
DECISION
Ervin and Associates, Inc. protests the Department of Housing and
Urban Development's (HUD) decision to compete two task orders among
its seven management studies contractors, all of whose contracts were
awarded under request for proposals (RFP) No. DU100C000018431. Ervin
argues that both task orders--one requesting operations analysis of
HUD's Office of Housing and one requesting management studies and
budget formulation for HUD's portfolio reengineering program--are
beyond the scope of the management studies contracts.
We deny the protests.
BACKGROUND
Management Studies Contracts
The solicitation, issued July 12, 1995, anticipated the award of
multiple indefinite-quantity contracts for management studies and
analytical services. Each contractor was to receive orders worth a
minimum of $100,000 and a maximum of $25 million over the 48-month
life of the contract. RFP at B-1, F-1. Specific services were to be
requested and defined through the issuance of task orders; the
government reserved the right to compete each task order among the
awardee(s). Id. at B-2.
The objectives section of the statement of work (SOW) advised offerors
that HUD sought to identify contractors to "conceptualize, organize,
conduct sophisticated research studies and analyses, and to provide
professional assistance in the areas under review." RFP sec. C.II.
Contractors were to perform tasks while providing analytical support
to the Secretary, Deputy Secretary, and "all other organizational
components of HUD," which will result in "information, advice, or
recommendations relating to efficient and effective management and
delivery of HUD programs and services." Id.
The SOW set forth several objectives for which it required the
contractors' assistance, such as "initiate study efforts shortly after
they are defined"; "quickly and effectively respond to requests for
studies, special analyses and reviews covering a wide variety of
topics"; "carry out necessary evaluations and analyses of the
Department's internal controls, financial management systems and
analysis, computer security and other quality assurance activities";
"accommodate a broad range of service requests utilizing an
established pool of contractor resources"; and "develop measures which
can be used to assess the performance of a given function or to
compare the performance of a given function by one organization to the
performance of that function by another organization." Contractors
also were to help HUD to provide "training, technical assistance or
other support services to assist managers in solving the root cause of
problems which impede effective and efficient program operations and
in implementing plans for increasing the effectiveness of their
organizations." Id.
The scope of work section of the SOW advised offerors that the
services under the management studies contracts might cover "any of
the functions for which the Department is responsible . . . ." RFP sec.
C.III.A.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...