Ervin and Associates, Inc., B-279161; B-279162; B-279187; B-
Case: B-279161
Agency:
Protester: Ervin and Associates, Inc., B
Date: 1998-04-20
Denied
Ervin and Associates, Inc., B-279161; B-279162; B-279187; B-
BNUMBER: B-279161; B-279162; B-279187; B-279188
DATE: April 20, 1998
TITLE: Ervin and Associates, Inc., B-279161; B-279162; B-279187; B-
279188, April 20, 1998
**********************************************************************
Matter of:Ervin and Associates, Inc.
File: B-279161; B-279162; B-279187; B-279188
Date:April 20, 1998
John J. Ervin for the protester.
Shari Weaver, Esq., and Michael J. Farley, Esq., Department of Housing
and Urban Development, for the agency.
Tania L. Calhoun, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
1. General Accounting Office will not consider allegation that
Department of Housing and Urban Development's use of the section 8(a)
program to meet its needs for various types of services is
unconstitutional in light of Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pe�a and
City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co. because neither decision
constitutes clear judicial precedent on the constitutionality or
legality of the contracting agency's use of this program.
2. General Accounting Office will not consider challenge to
contracting agency's use of section 8(a) set-aside solicitations as
part of its procurement strategy where there is no showing that
regulations may have been violated or of possible bad faith on the
part of government officials.
DECISION
Ervin and Associates, Inc. protests the Department of Housing and
Urban Development's (HUD) decision to satisfy its requirements for two
categories of services--due diligence services for HUD's Housing
Programs and comprehensive services for the Assistant Secretary for
Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner--by issuing, for each category of
services, one solicitation set aside for participants in the Small
Business Administration's (SBA) section 8(a) program and one
solicitation subject to full and open competition. Ervin argues that
HUD's use of the section 8(a) program to satisfy its needs is
unconstitutional and that HUD's parallel procurement strategy is
otherwise improper.
We deny the protests.
Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act authorizes SBA to enter into
contracts with government agencies and to arrange for the performance
of such contracts by awarding subcontracts to socially and
economically disadvantaged small business contractors. 15 U.S.C. sec.
637(a) (1994).
HUD has historically obtained due diligence services[1] through
section 8(a) set-aside contracts. HUD's most recent due diligence
contracts recently expired and, in preparing the follow-on
procurement, HUD realized that its need for due diligence services had
significantly increased from the initial needs it identified in late
1995. HUD decided that it was in the government's best interest to
obtain maximum competition to satisfy this increased capacity. To
this end, HUD implemented a parallel procurement strategy that would
enable it to continue sponsoring section 8(a) business development
opportunities by soliciting for due diligence services at the previous
level under the section 8(a) program, and to meet its expanded
requirements for these services by soliciting on a full and open
basis. Request for proposals (RFP) Nos. DU100C000018600 and
DU100C000018561, the set-aside and unrestricted solicitations,
respectively, were issued on November 21, 1997.
Each solicitation anticipates the award of multiple
indefinite-quantity task order contracts, and each contains the same
statement of work. RFPs sec. B-1(b), B-2, I-16, L-4, C. Each
solicitation guarantees a minimum order of $250,000 per contract and a
maximum of $30 million per contract. RFPs sec. B-3. Each solicitation
states that multiple awardees will be provided a fair opportunity to
be considered for award of each task order, pursuant to Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) sec. 16.505
(FAC 97-02),[2] and sets forth the same procedures for such
consideration.
RFPs sec. H-4.
HUD has historically obtained the comprehensive administrative,
professional, accounting, financial, and auditing support services for
overseeing all Federal Housing Administration programs and operations
through separate contracts, each of which was set aside under the
section 8(a) program. The services continue to be a significant
requirement and are now being consolidated. HUD explains that, in
furtherance of its commitment to providing maximum practicable
contracting opportunities to small disadvantaged business contractors,
it planned to procure a portion of the required services under the
section 8(a) program and a portion on a full and open basis. RFP Nos.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...