Capital Health Services, Inc.; JSA Healthcare Corporation, B-
Case: B-281439.3
Agency: Central Intelligence Agency
Protester: Capital Health Services, Inc.; JSA Healthcare Corporation, B
Date: 1999-03-23
Denied
Capital Health Services, Inc.; JSA Healthcare Corporation, B-
BNUMBER: B-281439.3; B-281439.4
DATE: March 23, 1999
TITLE: Capital Health Services, Inc.; JSA Healthcare Corporation, B-
281439.3; B-281439.4, March 23, 1999
**********************************************************************
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective
Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release.
Matter of:Capital Health Services, Inc.; JSA Healthcare Corporation
File: B-281439.3; B-281439.4
Date:March 23, 1999
Victor G. Klingelhofer, Esq., and John J. O'Brien, Esq., Cohen Mohr,
for the protesters.
Karl E. Hansen, Esq., TRICARE Management Activity, for the agency.
Ralph O. White, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
1. The Military-Civilian Health Services Partnership Program, 10
U.S.C. sec. 1096 (1994)--which authorizes the use of resource sharing
agreements between the military's medical treatment facilities and
civilian health care providers to deliver health care services to
active duty service personnel and other military-related
beneficiaries--is not a procurement statute for purposes of General
Accounting Office (GAO) bid protest jurisdiction. However, GAO will
take limited jurisdiction over the award of such agreements where the
protester alleges that the agreements have been improperly used to
avoid the requirements of the procurement statutes.
2. Protesters' contention that resource sharing agreements were an
improper attempt to avoid the requirements of the procurement statutes
is denied where the agreements were clearly within the authority
granted by the statute, and within the scope of the underlying
contract for managed health care services.
DECISION
Capital Health Services, Inc. and JSA Healthcare Corporation protest a
decision by the TRICARE Management Activity (TMA) to add the operation
of two existing NAVCARE outpatient medical clinics in San Diego,
California, to TMA's ongoing contract with Foundation Health Federal
Services, Inc. The protesters argue that the operation of the two
clinics is beyond the scope of Foundation's contract, that the agency
was required to hold a competition for the operation of the clinics,
and that the agency's use of resource sharing agreements to convey
operation of the clinics to Foundation violated the regulations
applicable to the use of such agreements.
We deny the protests.
BACKGROUND
The TRICARE Program
The Department of Defense (DOD) maintains an extensive network of
military medical treatment facilities (MTF) to provide direct care to
active duty service personnel and, on a space-available basis, to
other military-related beneficiaries, including dependents of active
duty personnel and military retirees and their dependents. The direct
care provided by the MTFs is supplemented by care paid for by DOD, but
provided in civilian facilities.
DOD has implemented a managed health care system, called the TRICARE
program, to control the costs associated with providing health care
to those eligible to receive it.[1] The TRICARE program uses a
managed care contractor to coordinate the access of health care
beneficiaries to MTFs and to supplemental civilian sector health care
providers. 32 C.F.R. sec. 199.17(a)(1) (1998). TMA is the DOD office
that directs the TRICARE program.
When the TRICARE program is implemented in a given area, the official
announcement identifies the geographical area covered by the program.
Id. at sec. 199.17(a)(5). The geographic area at issue in this case
encompasses Southern California, and is referred to as TRICARE Region
9. Within TRICARE's Region 9 are a number of MTFs, each of which is
responsible for providing health care (on a space-available basis, and
with certain priorities) to all eligible beneficiaries within a
geographical subset of the region, called the MTF's catchment area.
Id. The most significant MTF within Region 9 is the Naval Medical
Center San Diego (NMCSD). NMCSD's care, as well as that of the other
Region 9 MTFs, is supplemented by the region's managed care support
contractor, Foundation.
The TRICARE program offers three options for health care: (1) a
health maintenance organization-type plan, called TRICARE Prime; (2) a
network of preferred providers, called TRICARE Extra; and (3) a
standard fee-for-service plan, called TRICARE Standard. All active
duty military personnel are automatically enrolled under TRICARE
Prime; all other TRICARE-eligible beneficiaries are automatically
covered under the TRICARE Standard or Extra options, unless they
select enrollment in the TRICARE Prime program. 32 C.F.R. sec.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...