Draeger Safety, Inc., B-285366; B-285366.2, August 23, 2000
Case: B-285366
Agency:
Protester: Draeger Safety, Inc., B
Date: 2000-08-23
Denied
Draeger Safety, Inc., B-285366; B-285366.2, August 23, 2000
TITLE: Draeger Safety, Inc., B-285366; B-285366.2, August 23, 2000
BNUMBER: B-285366; B-285366.2
DATE: August 23, 2000
**********************************************************************
Draeger Safety, Inc., B-285366; B-285366.2, August 23, 2000
Decision
Matter of: Draeger Safety, Inc.
File: B-285366; B-285366.2
Date: August 23, 2000
David D. DiBari, Esq., William Silverman, Esq., Richard P. Ferrin, Esq., and
Anthony M. Cooke, Esq., Clifford, Chance, Rogers & Wells, for the protester.
Ron R. Hutchinson, Esq., and James D. Bachman, Esq., Doyle & Bachman, for
Scott Aviation, an intervenor.
Roger D. Waldron, Esq., General Services Administration, and John M. Davis,
Esq., Veronica E. Murtha, Esq., Lisa L. Hare, Esq., Valencia L. Bowers,
Esq., and Michael J. Glennon, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the
agencies.
Christine Davis, Esq., and James Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
1. Where an agency requests competition among Federal Supply Schedule
vendors and decides to shift to the vendors the burden of selecting items on
which to quote, the vendors must be given sufficient detail to allow them to
compete intelligently and fairly.
2. Agency reasonably declined to establish blanket purchase agreement for
self-contained breathing apparatuses with a Federal Supply Schedule vendor
whose offered products either did not meet the agency's stowage size
requirements or were otherwise unacceptable.
DECISION
Draeger Safety, Inc. protests the Department of the Navy's issuance of
blanket purchase agreement (BPA) No. N00024-00-A-4030, to Scott Aviation for
self-contained breathing apparatuses (SCBA) for use by sailors in fighting
shipboard fires. The Navy established the BPA under Scott's Federal Supply
Schedule (FSS) contract. Draeger, which also has an FSS contract for SCBAs,
protests that the Navy improperly determined that Draeger's equipment would
not meet the Navy's needs, and that Scott's equipment was unacceptable and
otherwise could not be ordered from the FSS.
We deny the protest.
An SCBA is a respiratory protection device that supplies oxygen to
firefighters, allowing them to breathe in areas with unbreathable or
contaminated air. The SCBA supplies air to the firefighter from compressed
air cylinders worn on the firefighter's back. Navy Report at 2. The SCBA is
worn as a backpack, with an adjustable waist belt and shoulder straps. See
Navy Report, Tab 37, Intervenor's Product Demonstration Video; Tab 38,
Protester's Product Demonstration Video.
The Navy sent a draft BPA to vendors holding FSS contracts for SCBAs,
including Draeger and Scott. The agency estimated a requirement for 25,000
SCBAs and stated that it would establish BPAs with either one or two
contractors representing "the best value" to meet this requirement. [1] The
Navy asked interested vendors to complete pricing grids in the draft BPA, to
perform a product demonstration of their SCBA units, and to loan the units
to the government for testing and evaluation. Other than stating that the
offered SCBAs must be commercially available, certified by the National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and meet or exceed National
Fire Protection Association Standard 1981, the Navy did not disclose to the
vendors any aspect of its particular requirements, its evaluation scheme,
its source selection criteria, or its testing procedures. Id., Tab 20,
Commerce Business Daily (CBD) Net Announcement; Tabs 22 and 23, Distribution
of Draft BPA to Protester and Intervenor. The Navy did answer various
questions from the vendors about its requirements, although none directly
related to whether the Navy had any size limitations for storage of the
SCBAs. Id., Tabs 24 and 25, Questions and Responses.
Draeger, Scott, and another firm responded to the draft BPA. Draeger's FSS
contract includes the AirBoss Evolution SCBA, which it demonstrated for the
Navy on December 7, 1999. Id. at 5-6; Tab 72, Modification of Protester's
FSS Contract. Draeger's AirBoss Evolution SCBA includes a removable comfort
pad, which Draeger's commercial literature describes as optional, although
this option is not priced in Draeger's FSS contract. Id., Tab 32,
Protester's Draft BPA, AirBoss Evolution Specification, General
Specifications, at 1; Tab 72, Modification of Protester's FSS Contract.
Scott's FSS contract includes the Air-Pak 4.5 SCBA, which it demonstrated
for the Navy on that same date. Id. at 5; Tab 27, Modification of
Intervenor's FSS Contract, Dec. 2, 1999. Following the vendors' product
demonstrations, the Navy borrowed Scott's and Draeger's SCBAs for evaluation
and testing.
Based upon its evaluation of the SCBAs, the Navy determined that the Draeger
unit was unsatisfactory for Navy use.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...