Aleman & Associates, Inc., B-287275.2; B-287356.2, July 2, 2001
Case: B-287275.2
Agency:
Protester: Aleman & Associates, Inc., B
Date: 2001-07-02
Sustained
Aleman & Associates, Inc., B-287275.2; B-287356.2, July 2, 2001
TITLE: Aleman & Associates, Inc., B-287275.2; B-287356.2, July 2, 2001
BNUMBER: B-287275.2; B-287356.2
DATE: July 2, 2001
**********************************************************************
Aleman & Associates, Inc., B-287275.2; B-287356.2, July 2, 2001
Decision
Matter of: Aleman & Associates, Inc.
File: B-287275.2; B-287356.2
Date: July 2, 2001
Albert T. Aleman, Jr., Aleman & Associates, Inc., for the protester.
Michael K. Cameron, Esq., Department of Justice, Immigration and
Naturalization Service, for the agency.
Jeanne W. Isrin, Esq., and Jerold D. Cohen, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
Cancellation of request for quotations (RFQ) for 1 year of janitorial and
grounds maintenance services, with 4 option years, on the basis that the
services had to be procured pursuant to the Javits-Wagner-O'Day (JWOD) Act,
was improper where only services for 240 days or fewer had to be acquired
under the statute. Related RFQ to cover a shorter term properly was
canceled, however, since a reasonable basis existed for cancellation.
DECISION
Aleman & Associates, Inc. protests the cancellation of request for
quotations Nos. ACD-8-Q-0024 (RFQ-0024) and ACD-1-Q-0008 (RFQ-0008), issued
by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), Department of Justice,
for janitorial and grounds maintenance services at border patrol stations
and related INS facilities in the Laredo, Texas area.
We sustain the protest.
The RFQs cover 12 facilities that employ Border Patrol agents who are
responsible for apprehending illegal immigrants and maintaining custody of
them at the facilities. INS previously had procured the required janitorial
and grounds maintenance services for 11 of the facilities competitively,
which had resulted in purchase orders to three different contractors; the
twelfth facility, the Laredo North Station, was not open at that time. INS
then decided to consolidate its requirements in the interest of higher
quality performance, efficiency in acquisition, and consistency in services
received, and in March 2000 issued RFQ-0024, set aside for small businesses,
for long-term services (a 1-year base period plus 4 option years) to be
provided at the original 11 facilities plus the Laredo North Station, which
was scheduled to open on November 1, 2000.
Five quotations were received on June 2, 2000. The agency evaluated them and
made a competitive range determination, which included Aleman's quotation.
Subsequently, amendments were issued, and revised quotations were received
on August 25. Due to a protracted review process and a lack of personnel
resources, evaluation of revised quotations was delayed. On February 12,
2001, Aleman protested the delay in making award, an alleged solicitation
defect, and a competitive advantage that one vendor had improperly gained,
according to Aleman. Further revised quotations were requested by February
20. Meanwhile, INS issued RFQ-0008 to competitively procure its short-term
requirements for the 12 facilities until the procurement under RFQ-0024 was
completed. [1] On March 5, Aleman protested RFQ-0008, arguing that the
solicitation was ambiguous and reflected numerous violations of the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR).
On March 20, INS canceled both RFQs based on the agency's determination that
the required services had to be procured through the National Industries for
the Severely Handicapped (NISH) pursuant to FAR Subpart 8.7, which
implements the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (JWOD Act), 41 U.S.C. sect.sect. 46-48c
(1994). Subsequently, the agency awarded a short-term contract for the
required services (and added a 13th facility) through NISH (which represents
JWOD-participating nonprofit agencies), for 1 month with an option to extend
for 6 months.
Aleman protested both cancellations on March 22, arguing that the agency was
not required to procure either requirement from a mandatory source, and
hence no reasonable basis for cancellation existed in either case.
We agree with Aleman as to RFQ-0024 and we therefore sustain the protest of
that cancellation. We deny the protest with respect to RFQ-0008.
The JWOD Act provides authority for noncompetitive acquisitions for
specified supplies or services. See FAR sect. 6.302-5(b)(2). The Act establishes
the Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled
(the Committee), and grants it exclusive authority to establish and maintain
a procurement list of supplies and services provided by qualified nonprofit
agencies for the blind or disabled. 41 U.S.C. sect.sect. 46(a), 47(a); see FAR
Subpart 8.7. Once a service has been added to the procurement list,
contracting agencies are required to acquire that service directly from a
qualified workshop, if the service is available within the period required.
41 U.S.C. sect. 48; FAR sect.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...