Sabreliner Corporation, B-288030; B-288030.2, September 13, 2001
Case: B-288030
Agency:
Protester: Sabreliner Corporation, B
Date: 2001-09-13
Sustained
Sabreliner Corporation, B-288030; B-288030.2, September 13, 2001
TITLE: Sabreliner Corporation, B-288030; B-288030.2, September 13, 2001
BNUMBER: B-288030; B-288030.2
DATE: September 13, 2001
**********************************************************************
Sabreliner Corporation, B-288030; B-288030.2, September 13, 2001
Decision
Matter of: Sabreliner Corporation
File: B-288030; B-288030.2
Date: September 13, 2001
Kenneth B. Weckstein, Esq., Shlomo D. Katz, Esq., and Tammy Hopkins, Esq.,
Epstein Becker & Green, for the protester.
Christine S. Trafford, Esq., and John L. Rice, Esq., Miller & Chevalier, for
Rolls-Royce, Corporation, the intervenor.
Vera Meza, Esq., Rachel M. Howard, Esq., and Wade Brown, Esq., Department of
the Army, for the agency.
John L. Formica, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
Agency's proposed award of a sole-source contract for engineering and
overhaul services for helicopter engines, on the basis that only one firm is
capable of meeting the agency's needs, is not reasonably based where the
justification and approval prepared in support of the proposed sole-source
award, other agency documentation, and the agency's submissions prepared in
response to this protest as well as the testimony of the agency
representatives at the hearing held at our Office in connection with this
protest, are inconsistent and inaccurate.
DECISION
Sabreliner Corporation protests the proposed award of a contract on a
sole-source basis to Rolls-Royce, Corporation under request for proposals
(RFP) No. DAAH23-01-R-0067, issued by the Army Aviation and Missile Command,
Department of the Army, for certain engineering services and the overhaul of
helicopter engines.
We sustain the protest.
BACKGROUND
The T63-A-720 engines to be overhauled under the Army's proposed sole-source
contract to Rolls-Royce are used in the Army's OH-58 "Kiowa" helicopter.
Agency Supplemental Report (Aug. 6, 2001) at 2. The Kiowa helicopter has
been in service for approximately 30 years. Hearing Transcript (Tr.) at 14.
Up until the mid-1990s, the Army had an "organic" (i.e., in-house) ability
to overhaul the engines.
Agency Supplemental Report at 2; Tr. at 15-16.
As part of its in-house ability, the Army maintained an "instruction manual
describing the operations, procedures, and practices required to overhaul
the engines." Agency Supplemental Report at 2. This instruction manual,
called a "Depot Maintenance Work Requirement" (DMWR), also listed the
required tooling and test equipment to perform the overhauls. Id. The Army
maintained and updated the DMWR through amendments made by its own
engineers, as well as through its receipt of commercial engine bulletins
from the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) of the T63 engine. [1] Tr. at
19-20. The DMWR was also used to competitively procure engine overhaul
services from commercial vendors, with the last such contract being let in
1993. Agency Report, Tab B, Justification and Approval for Other than Full
and Open Competition (J&A) (Jan. 2, 2001) at 4; Tr. at 24, 145-46.
The Army decided in the mid-1990s to phase out the Kiowa helicopter in 2004,
and stopped maintaining its DMWR as of 1993. Tr. at 21, 144, 146, 394. The
last overhauls of the engines were performed in-house in 1997 using the DMWR
and available updates. Tr. 25-27, 146-47. The agency states that it needs to
procure the engineering services from Rolls-Royce because the Army's DMWR is
out of date, and it needs to procure the overhaul services from Rolls-Royce
because the Army has divested itself of the tooling and equipment needed to
overhaul the engines. [2]
Agency Supplemental Report at 3 n.1; Tr. at 16.
On January 13, 2001, the Army published a notice in the Commerce Business
Daily (CBD) of its intention to award a sole-source contract to Rolls-Royce.
The CBD referenced solicitation No. DAAH23-01-R-0067, and stated, among
other things, that the contractor would be required to "furnish all
depot-level labor, facilities, special tooling, test equipment, and
materials for the maintenance, overhaul/repair modification" of up to 300 of
the engines, and that "[t]he contractor will also upgrade Engine
configuration to commercial and provide all technical data to identify the
engineering changes." Agency Report, Tab E, CBD Notice.
Shortly after the CBD notice was published, Sabreliner and two other firms
requested copies of the solicitation. Contracting Officer's Statement at 1;
Agency Report, Tab F, Sabreliner's Letter to Agency (Jan. 19, 2001). The
agency did not respond to the firms' requests, but rather, the contracting
officer continued to meet with, and receive proposals from, Rolls-Royce with
the intent of awarding Rolls-Royce a sole-source contract.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...