Daston Corporation, B-292583; B-292583.2, October 20, 2003
Case: B-292583
Agency:
Protester: Daston Corporation, B
Date: 2003-10-20
Denied
Daston Corporation, B-292583; B-292583.2, October 20, 2003
TITLE: Daston Corporation, B-292583; B-292583.2, October 20, 2003
BNUMBER: B-292583; B-292583.2
DATE: October 20, 2003
**********************************************************************
Daston Corporation, B-292583; B-292583.2, October 20, 2003
Decision
Matter of: Daston Corporation
File: B-292583; B-292583.2
Date: October 20, 2003
Richard J. Webber, Esq., and Frederick D. McKalip, Esq., Arent Fox Kintner
Plotkin & Kahn, for the protester.
Cyrus E. Phillips, IV, Esq., for Catapult Technology, Ltd., an intervenor.
Sherri L. Pappas, Esq., and Terence W. Carlson, Esq., Department of
Transportation, for the agency.
Katherine I. Riback, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
Agency had a reasonable basis to cancel solicitation for information
technology support services for one agency division, where the record
shows that the agency no longer had a need for these services due to an
agency-wide plan to consolidate information technology services.
DECISION
Daston Corporation protests the cancellation of request for proposals
(RFP) No. DTRS56-03-R-0006 by the Department of Transportation (DOT) for
information technology (IT) support services. Daston maintains that the
decision to cancel the solicitation lacks a reasonable basis. Daston also
contends that the agency*s modification of an existing contract with
Catapult Technology, Ltd., for operational maintenance services, to add
this work was outside the scope of that contract.
We deny the protest.
The RFP was issued on May 16, 2003 by the Research and Special Programs
Administration (RSPA), 1 of the 11 divisions of DOT. The RSPA operates
the Hazardous Materials Information System (HMIS), the primary source of
national data for the federal, state, and local government agencies
responsible for the safety of hazardous materials transportation. RSPA
issued the solicitation to four Small Business Administration (SBA)
certified 8(a) businesses with General Services Administration Federal
Supply Schedule contracts. The RFP requested proposals for a base year
commencing July 1 with two 1-year options for services that had previously
been provided by two different contractors: (1) system development and
integration, database design and management, data analysis and entry, and
dissemination of the HMIS database, which provides data and database
administration, statistical analysis, and standard and specialized reports
concerning hazardous materials spills and on regulatory matters; and (2)
systems and operational support of the RSPA local area network, wide area
network, website development, and web infrastructures, and help desk
services.
The agency received three proposals in response to the RFP by the May 27
proposal due date, including Daston*s and Catapult*s.
Meanwhile, on May 28, DOT*s Chief Information Officer (CIO) informed the
CIOs of the DOT divisions, including RSPA*s CIO, of a proposal that the IT
infrastructures of the various divisions be consolidated into the CIO*s
office by September 30, 2005.
The agency conducted an oral presentation and question and answer sessions
with each of the three vendors on May 29, and, on June 3, the agency began
evaluating the proposals. Clarifications were requested on June 4 and
received on June 5.
Meanwhile, on June 5, the RSPA*s CIO received the timeline for DOT*s
consolidation of IT infrastructures; this timeline indicated that
consolidation was to commence by March 2004, with the consolidation of all
DOT IT operations to be completed by September 30, 2005. RSPA*s CIO held
a meeting with other RSPA officials on June 6 to discuss this
consolidation plan. It was at this meeting that the contracting officer
first learned of DOT*s consolidation plan and timetable.
As a result of that meeting, the contracting officer on that same day
instructed that the evaluation of the proposals be suspended pending a
decision on whether the agency would continue with this procurement or
cancel the solicitation. Since the timetable established by the CIO
indicated that consolidation was to commence in March 2004, 4 months
before the base year term was to expire, the agency determined that it
would be necessary to terminate any award it might make under this RFP to
meet the agency*s requirements. To avoid this scenario, the agency
cancelled the solicitation on June 10.
On June 13, the RSPA entered into a *customer agreement* with, and
transferred funds to, the Office of the Secretary of Transportation for
that office to provide RSPA with these solicited IT services.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...