Washington Adventist Hospital, B-294371.3; B-294371.4, January 21, 2005
Case: B-294371.3
Agency:
Protester: Washington Adventist Hospital, B
Date: 2005-01-21
Denied
Washington Adventist Hospital, B-294371.3; B-294371.4, January 21, 2005
TITLE: Washington Adventist Hospital, B-294371.3; B-294371.4, January 21, 2005
BNUMBER: B-294371.3; B-294371.4
DATE: January 21, 2005
**********************************************************************
Decision
Matter of: Washington Adventist Hospital
File: B-294371.3; B-294371.4
Date: January 21, 2005
Paul M. Vincent, Esq., and E. John Steren, Esq., Ober, Kaler, Grimes &
Shriver, for the protester.
Douglas W. Kornreich, Esq., Department of Health and Human Services, for
the agency.
Mary G. Curcio, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
In solicitation for hospital to partner with agency in establishing
cardiothoracic surgery branch, geographical restriction requiring hospital
to be within 10-minute walk or 5-minute drive from agency campus is
reasonable where record shows restriction is necessary to meet agency's
programmatic needs, which include quick accessibility to campus and
hospital due to frequent interaction between program members in different
locations.
DECISION
Washington Adventist Hospital (WAH) protests the geographical restriction
in solicitation No. NHLBI-HI-05-18, issued by the National Institutes of
Health (NIH), National Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
(NHLBI), for a hospital to partner with the agency in establishing a
cardiothoracic surgery branch (CTSB).
We deny the protest.
Prior to 1990, as part of its intramural research branch, NHLBI included a
CTSB, which linked basic laboratory research and clinical investigation
and served as a research and training program for surgeons. NHLBI desires
to reestablish the CTSB, but does not have the facilities or staff to
provide treatment for patients requiring acute or emergency cardiac care.
As a result, the agency determined that the best way to accomplish its
goals was to collaborate with an outside hospital, with surgeries taking
place there and research being performed at the hospital and at the NHLBI
laboratory. NHLBI further determined that it would be necessary for the
hospital to be in close proximity to the agency's research laboratory, in
order to minimize the time spent by program participants traveling between
the two facilities, and to maximize the time they could devote to research
activities while also responding to patient needs. Consequently, in its
November 4, 2004, "sources sought" synopsis, the agency announced its
intention to award a sole-source contract to Suburban Hospital, the only
hospital a short distance from NHLBI. Among other things, the synopsis
stated the requirement that the offeror be within a 5-minute drive or a
10-minute walk of the NHLBI campus; only Suburban Hospital meets this
restriction.
WAH, which is approximately 9.2 to 10.8 miles and 15 to 22 minutes from
the campus by car (the protester's and agency's calculations differ),
challenges the proposed sole-source award on the basis that the
geographical restriction is not warranted. WAH asserts that its
facilities are close enough to the NHLBI campus for the program to
succeed, and that it would bring other benefits to the program--such as
its experience as a leading cardiac-surgery institution and the fact that,
unlike Suburban Hospital, it has existing facilities--that, overall, would
make it a better choice than Suburban Hospital.
A contracting agency has the primary responsibility for determining its
minimum needs and the best method of accommodating them. Daniel Tech.,
Inc., B-288853, Dec. 13, 2001, 2001 CPD P 203. An agency properly may
restrict a procurement to offerors within a specified area if it shows
that the restriction is reasonably necessary for the agency to meet its
needs. Imperial 400 Motor Inn, B-227270, Aug. 21, 1987, 87-2 CPD P 192.
NHLBI has shown that the geographical restriction here is necessary to
meet its needs. Key to the CTSB that the agency has in mind is the
concept--based on the academic model--of a medical campus, where close
proximity of the hospital and laboratory will facilitate the close daily
interaction between NHLBI personnel, hospital personnel and patients that
is necessary to permit the desired intellectual integration between basic
science, clinical investigations and patient care. More specifically, it
is intended that the surgeons in the laboratory will collaborate with the
basic investigators in the Division of Intramural Research in the NHLBI
building. The research products will then be translated into clinical
investigations at the collaborating hospital in a "bench-to-bedside"
approach. Draft Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition at
2.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...