SOS International, Ltd., B-295533.2; B-295533.3, July 1, 2005
Case: B-295533.2
Agency:
Protester: SOS International, Ltd., B
Date: 2005-07-01
Denied
SOS International, Ltd., B-295533.2; B-295533.3, July 1, 2005
TITLE: SOS International, Ltd., B-295533.2; B-295533.3, July 1, 2005
BNUMBER: B-295533.2; B-295533.3
DATE: July 1, 2005
**********************************************************************
Decision
Matter of: SOS International, Ltd.
File: B-295533.2; B-295533.3
Date: July 1, 2005
Jessica C. Abrahams, Esq., Alison L. Doyle, Esq., and Jason N. Workmaster,
Esq., McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, for the protester.
Kristen A. Bennett, Esq., Moore & Lee, LLP, for McNeil Technologies, Inc.,
an intervenor.
Sheryl A. Butler, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement
Administration, for the agency.
Monica P. Anatalio, Scott H. Riback, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq.,
Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the
decision.
DIGEST
1. Bid that included tiered pricing where solicitation did not
contemplate bidding on such a basis is nonetheless responsive where record
shows that awardee's pricing scheme did not condition the bid in any way,
and bid is low using any of the tiered prices.
2. Where solicitation provided for award of contract on indefinite
quantity basis, bid that offered larger quantity than maximum specified in
solicitation is responsive, where bid did not limit government's right to
purchase only up to the maximum quantity specified in the solicitation or
otherwise condition the firm's pricing or performance on the government's
buying the larger quantity.
DECISION
SOS International Ltd. protests the award of a contract to McNeil
Technologies, Inc. under Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) request for
proposals (RFP) No. DEA-04-R-0012, for linguistic services in support of
law enforcement efforts at DEA's San Diego Field Division. SOS contends
that DEA should have rejected McNeil's bid as nonresponsive.
We deny the protest.
The solicitation contemplated the award of an indefinite-delivery,
indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract for a base year, with four 1-year
options, to provide law enforcement support services, including
interception, monitoring, translation and transcription. The RFP was
issued as a two-step sealed bid acquisition under Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) Section 14.5. During the first step, interested firms
submitted technical proposals that were evaluated to determine their
acceptability. During the second step, a formal invitation for bids (IFB)
was issued to those firms found to have submitted acceptable technical
proposals. See id.
During the course of the acquisition, the agency issued a number of
amendments to the solicitation. Relevant here, contract line item number
(CLIN) 0003 erroneously listed a maximum of 66,000 hours instead of the
agency's actual requirement, which was for 50,000 hours. Consequently,
DEA amended the solicitation to reflect the 50,000 hour figure.
The agency received 10 technical proposals, seven of which were found to
be technically acceptable. The seven firms submitting the technically
acceptable proposals were thereafter requested to submit bids. At bid
opening, McNeil's was the apparent low bid. After reviewing McNeil's bid,
the agency initially determined that it was nonresponsive because McNeil
had used tiered pricing in CLIN 0003, 0004, 0005, 0006 and 0009. More
specifically, while the solicitation called for a single unit price for
each CLIN, McNeil's bid included more than one price for each CLIN, with
the price varying depending upon the quantity ordered (for example, under
CLIN 0004, McNeil bid $26.93 per hour for the first 400 hours, and $24.03
for all hours in excess of 400 hours, up to the specified maximum quantity
of 15,000 hours). In addition, McNeil's bid sheet showed the original
66,000 hour maximum quantity for CLIN 0003, rather than the amended 50,000
hour figure. Finally, for CLIN 0002, McNeil's bid schedule included the
title "team leader" rather than the term "shift supervisor," as provided
for in the solicitation. Based on these perceived deficiencies, the
contracting officer advised McNeil that its bid had been found
nonresponsive.
McNeil protested the agency's decision to our Office. In response to that
protest, the agency advised us that it intended to reconsider the McNeil
bid, and we dismissed McNeil's protest as academic. (B-295533, Jan. 10,
2005). Thereafter, McNeil and the agency engaged in several rounds of
correspondence. As a result of that correspondence, McNeil was permitted
to substitute the correct 50,000 hour maximum quantity for CLIN 0003
(replacing the 66,000 hour figure), to correct minor mathematical errors
in its overtime rates, and to substitute the term "shift supervisor" for
"team leader" in its bid schedule. The seven technically acceptable bids
then were reevaluated, and it was determined that McNeil's revised bid of
$12,252,065 was low; SOS's bid of $13,889,265 was next low.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...