B-296358.3; B-296358.4, DOR Biodefense, Inc.; Emergent BioSolutions, January 31, 2006
Case: B-296358.3
Agency:
Protester: B
Date: 2006-01-31
Denied
B-296358.3; B-296358.4, DOR Biodefense, Inc.; Emergent BioSolutions, January 31, 2006
TITLE: B-296358.3; B-296358.4, DOR Biodefense, Inc.; Emergent BioSolutions, January 31, 2006
BNUMBER: B-296358.3; B-296358.4
DATE: January 31, 2006
*************************************************************************************
B-296358.3; B-296358.4, DOR Biodefense, Inc.; Emergent BioSolutions, January 31, 2006
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective
Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release.
Decision
Matter of: DOR Biodefense, Inc.; Emergent BioSolutions
File: B-296358.3; B-296358.4
Date: January 31, 2006
Jessica C. Abrahams, Esq., Jeniffer M. De Jesus, Esq., Stephen E. Ruscus,
Esq., and Frank M. Rapoport, Esq., McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, for the
protesters.
Helaine G. Elderkin, Esq., Carl J. Peckinpaugh, Esq., and Cheralyn S.
Cameron, Esq., for Computer Science Corp., an intervenor.
Scott N. Flesch, Esq., Department of the Army, and Eric Lile, Esq., Joint
Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense, for the
agency.
Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
Protest that modification of contract for research and development of
botulinum vaccine was outside scope of the original contract is denied
where changes did not substantially alter the contract's type of work,
costs or period of performance beyond that which could have been
reasonably anticipated by offerors.
DECISION
DOR Biodefense, Inc. and Emergent BioSolutions protest the issuance of
modification P00186 of contract No. DAMD17-98-C-8024 by the Department of
the Army Space and Missile Command to DynPort Vaccine Company, LLC
(DVC).[1] The protesters contend that the modification was beyond the
scope of the original contract, and thus was an improper sole-source award
to DVC. The protesters also contend that the agency failed to take
reasonable corrective action in response to earlier protests concerning
the modification.
We deny the protests.
BACKGROUND
The agency awarded a contract to DVC, under solicitation No.
DAMD17-95-R-5020 (RFP) in 1997. The contract was issued by the Joint
Vaccination Acquisition Program (JVAP), which was established in 1996 by
the Department of Defense (DOD) to develop and stockpile biological
defense vaccines for use by the U.S. military. Memorandum of Law at 1-2.
The JVAP issued the RFP in August 1996, seeking proposals for award of a
contract to a prime systems contractor for the management of vaccine
development, licensure and production efforts. Id. at 2. The contractor
was required to "use information and materials from the existing DoD
program to create and execute an integrated approach leading to FDA [Food
and Drug Administration] licensure and long term production/stockpiling of
each vaccine (life cycle management to the point of product release to the
DoD distribution chain)." RFP at C-1. Offerors were required to propose a
comprehensive technical approach to meeting DOD's biological defense
needs. Offerors were required to propose an Integrated Master Plan (IMP)
that described their approach to "the core activities and processes
necessary to achieve the program objectives (i.e. the [statement of
objectives])." RFP attach. 1, IMP Instructions, at 1. The RFP, however,
did not specify particular technical approaches for vaccine development,
but rather identified general process requirements and the types of
biological threats that the agency could select for vaccine development
and production.
The RFP listed contract line item numbers (CLINs) for general requirements
such as systems integration, hazard risk insurance, storage and
maintenance of intermediaries, and special studies, as well as development
of three vaccines for protection against Q-fever, vaccinia, and tularemia.
RFP at B-2. The RFP listed optional CLINs for development and licensure of
biological warfare vaccines for the following vaccines: monovalent and
multivalent botulinum serotypes, ricin, staphylococcal enterotoxin B,
venezuelan equine encephalitis, combined Venezuelan/eastern/western equine
encephalitis, brucellosis, plague, improved anthrax, and vaccinia immune
globulin. Id. As relevant here, optional CLIN 0016 required development of
a tetravalent botulinum vaccine for serotypes A, B, E and F.[2] Id. The
RFP advised offerors that it reserved the right to "change the list above
to add or delete products as the need may arise." RFP at B-1, C-1.
All of the vaccines developed under the contract require approval and
licensure by the FDA. RFP at C-1.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...