B-296536, Computers Universal, Inc., August 18, 2005

Case: B-296536 Agency: Protester: B Date: 2005-08-18 Denied
View full decision with AI analysis on ProtestIntel →
B-296536 Aug 18, 2005 Jump To VIEW DECISION DOWNLOADS RELATED PAGES GAO CONTACTS Highlights Computers Universal, Inc. (CUI) protests the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) extension of a sole-source purchase order issued to abcISP, Inc. under that firm's General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts, for information technology services for the Naval Medical Center in San Diego, California. We deny the protest. View Decision B-296536, Computers Universal, Inc., August 18, 2005 Decision Matter of: Computers Universal, Inc. File: B-296536 Date: August 18, 2005 Peter L. Cannon for the protester. Michael R. Rizzo, Esq., McKenna, Long and Aldridge, LLP, for abcISP, Inc., an intervenor. Dennis Foley, Esq., and Philip Kauffman, Esq., Department of Veterans Affairs, for the agency. Katherine I. Riback, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Protest that agency's extension of a sole-source purchase order issued under the awardee's General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule contracts is improper, is denied, where the agency established a reasonable basis for the limited extension until the protester's currently pending protest with our Office of the competitive procurement is resolved and award is made. DECISION Computers Universal, Inc. (CUI) protests the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) extension of a sole-source purchase order issued to abcISP, Inc. under that firm's General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts, for information technology services for the Naval Medical Center in San Diego, California. We deny the protest. On October 6, 2004, CUI was awarded a contract for these services under a competitive procurement. Because of a protest by abcISP, on October 7, a stop work order was issued under that awarded contract. While that protest was being resolved, VA commenced issuing a series of sole-source –emergency— purchase orders and extensions thereto under abcISP's GSA contracts to satisfy its interim requirements for these services until this, and several following protests, were resolved. In part because of the issues raised by abcISP's protest, CUI's contract was terminated for convenience on February 23, 2005 because the Navy was not satisfied that CUI would provide qualified programmers. A new solicitation for these services was issued on February 28, which was protested by CUI (B'296003) and later canceled by the agency due to administrative errors. On May 2, the agency issued solicitation No. RFQ 600-134-05 for these services. On May 25, CUI protested the terms of this solicitation before the proposal due date (B'296501), essentially contending that they exceeded the agency's needs and provided abcISP with an unfair competitive advantage.[1] Specifically, CUI argues in its protest that abcISP worked with the agency to prepare the solicitation, in particular the evaluation criteria, so that the requirements could only be met by abcISP's employees. By this time, purchase order modifications had extended abcISP's performance for these services under its FSS contract to April 25, and then to May 31. Due to CUI's protest, a contract for these services cannot be awarded under the competitive solicitation, and a modification to the purchase order further extending abcISP's performance for a period of 30 days was issued under abcISP's FSS contract; subsequent 30-day extensions are contemplated while the protest is being resolved and award made under the protested competitive solicitation. On June 21, the agency prepared a justification for other than full and open competition supporting the sole-source award to abcISP. In the justification, the agency stated that the emergency task orders have been issued to continue critical information technology support for the Navy Medical Center in San Diego due to the continuing solicitation protests, and that to change service providers for each emergency task order would lead to loss of productivity, increased training costs, and a probable failure of a computer program which assists hundreds of physicians with their clinical tasks on a daily basis. The justification indicated that abcISP had been performing these services for the past 5 years as either a subcontractor or contractor and –no alternate sources could be identified that can provide this specific critical service on an emergency interim basis.— Agency Report, Tab 13, Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition. On June 6, CUI protested the latest extension of abcISP's purchase order from June 1 through June 30.[2] In its protest CUI does not dispute that these services are critical or argue that these interim requirements do not need to be provided while CUI's latest protest is resolved and award is made under the protested competitive solicitation.

Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...