B-298077, Critical Incident Solutions, LLC, May 30, 2006

B-298077 May 30, 2006 Jump To VIEW DECISION DOWNLOADS RELATED PAGES GAO CONTACTS Highlights Critical Incident Solutions, Inc. (CIS) protests the award of a contract to Applied Marine Technology, Inc. (AMTI) under request for quotations (RFQ) No. N00189-06-T-Z366, issued by the Department of the Navy for non-personal exercise and training planning services required by the Naval Explosive Ordnance Disposal Mobile Unit Two (EODMU2). We deny the protest. View Decision B-298077, Critical Incident Solutions, LLC, May 30, 2006 Decision Matter of: Critical Incident Solutions, LLC File: B-298077 Date: May 30, 2006 Robert L. Ford for the protester. Davis Young, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency. Katherine I. Riback, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Agency reasonably determined that the protester's quotation was unacceptable where the required resume of the proposed planner included in the quotation did not show that he had the required experience. DECISION Critical Incident Solutions, Inc. (CIS) protests the award of a contract to Applied Marine Technology, Inc. (AMTI) under request for quotations (RFQ) No. N00189-06-T-Z366, issued by the Department of the Navy for non-personal exercise and training planning services required by the Naval Explosive Ordnance Disposal Mobile Unit Two (EODMU2). We deny the protest. The global presence of EODMU2 personnel, coupled with their extended, accelerated, and unplanned deployment, have created urgent requirements in individual and detachment pre-deployment training schedules, since the attacks of September 11, 2001. To this end, the agency issued the RFQ, which sought a Senior EOD Exercise and Training Planner, who was to provide assistance with the development, coordination, execution and documentation of the EODMU2 pre-deployment training program. The planner's tasks include development and supervision of exercise scenarios based on real world intelligence and events, development of training programs, supervision of the scheduling of training areas, and drafting post-exercise reports. RFQ at 6-7. The RFQ was issued to five vendors holding General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts. The RFQ listed two evaluation criteria, resumes and price. The RFQ stated that the resumes would be evaluated on a pass/fail basis, and that if the resume was determined to –fail,— then this would render the entire quotation –unacceptable.— RFQ at 4. The RFQ's resume requirements for the proposed planner were stated as follows: The contractor [i.e., the planner] shall have experience in EOD operations and the asymmetrical Improvised Explosive Device (IED) threat. Of particular value in awarding of the contract is overseas EOD and IED related client support in Iraq and Afghanistan. Specifically, the contractor shall have experience with the Combined Exploitation Cell, Counter-IED technology, and IED/WMD [weapons of mass destruction] detect and defeat programs. The contractor shall also have Subject Matter Expert (SME) reach-back capabilities to assist with technical issues ranging from bench-level scientific and literary research to military specialties such as Special Operations Force (SOF) and EOD. The contractor shall have, at a minimum, 15 years experience in US Naval EOD and have qualified as a Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Master Technician. The contractor shall have prior experience in the field of military training and the evaluation of EOD training operations. RFQ at 4. The RFQ further instructed potential vendors: Quoters are required to submit resumes on the form provided as Attachment 1, Resume Form which will be used to assess the quoter's capability to perform tasks described in the Statement of Work. RFQ at 9. The resume form stated that –[r]esume length must not exceed the provided three (3) pages (exclusive of the cover sheet).— RFQ, attach. 1, at 2. CIS and AMTI were the only vendors that responded to the RFQ. CIS's quotation not only included a 4-page resume, but also 92 pages of additional informational materials.[1] The agency determined that CIS's quotation was technically unacceptable, based on its review of the resume, which did not indicate that the proposed planner had the required experience with the Combined Exploitation Cell, Counter-IED technology, and IED/WMD detect and defeat programs; had experience in overseas EOD operation and the asymmetrical IED threat client support in Afghanistan and Iran; or was qualified as a Navy Master EOD Technician. In contrast, AMTI's slightly higher-priced quotation included a 4-page resume, from which the agency determined that the proposed planner met all of the requirements. The agency therefore determined that AMTI represented the best value to the government and made award to that firm.