B-298249.6, B-298249.7, B-298249.8, B-298249.9, B-298249.10, B-298249.11, B-298249.12, B-298249.13, B-298249.14, B-298249.15, B-298249.16, B-298249.17, B-298249.18, B-298249.19, B-298249.20, Multimax, Inc.; NCI Information Systems, Inc.; BAE Systems Information Technology LLC; Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc.; Pragmatics, Inc., October 24, 2006
Case: B-298249.6
Agency:
Date: 2006-10-24
Sustained
B-298249.6, B-298249.7, B-298249.8, B-298249.9, B-298249.10, B-298249.11, B-298249.12, B-298249.13, B-298249.14, B-298249.15, B-298249.16, B-298249.17, B-298249.18, B-298249.19, B-298249.20, Multimax, Inc.; NCI Information Systems, Inc.; BAE Systems Information Technology LLC; Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc.; Pragmatics, Inc., October 24, 2006
TITLE: B-298249.6, B-298249.7, B-298249.8, B-298249.9, B-298249.10, B-298249.11, B-298249.12, B-298249.13, B-298249.14, B-298249.15, B-298249.16, B-298249.17, B-298249.18, B-298249.19, B-298249.20, Multimax, Inc.; NCI Information Systems, Inc.; BAE Systems Information Technology LLC; Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc.; Pragmatics, Inc., October 24, 2006
BNUMBER: B-298249.6, B-298249.7, B-298249.8, B-298249.9, B-298249.10, B-298249.11, B-298249.12, B-298249.13, B-298249.14, B-298249.15, B-298249.16, B-298249.17, B-298249.18, B-298249.19, B-298249.20
DATE: October 24, 2006
******************************************************************************************************************************************
B-298249.6, B-298249.7, B-298249.8, B-298249.9, B-298249.10,B-298249.11, B-298249.12, B-298249.13, B-298249.14, B-298249.15, B-298249.16, B-298249.17, B-298249.18, B-298249.19, B-298249.20, Multimax, Inc.; NCI Information Systems, Inc.; BAE Systems Information Technology LLC; Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc.; Pragmatics, Inc., October 24, 2006
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective
Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release.
Decision
Matter of: Multimax, Inc.; NCI Information Systems, Inc.; BAE Systems
Information Technology LLC; Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc.;
Pragmatics, Inc.
File: B-298249.6, B-298249.7, B-298249.8, B-298249.9, B-298249.10,
B-298249.11, B-298249.12, B-298249.13, B-298249.14, B-298249.15,
B-298249.16, B-298249.17, B-298249.18, B-298249.19, B-298249.20
Date: October 24, 2006
David S. Cohen, Esq., John J. O*Brien, Esq., Rowena Laxa, Esq., Laurel
Hockey, Esq., and Catherine Kroll, Esq., Cohen Mohr, for Multimax, Inc.;
Shelly L. Ewald, Esq., Timothy E. Heffernan, Esq., Louis B. Antonacci,
Esq., Meghan M. DiPerna, Esq., and Justin M. Hargrove, Esq., Watt, Tieder,
Hoffar & Fitzgerald, for NCI Information Systems, Inc; Drew A. Harker,
Esq., Matthew H. Solomson, Esq., Chad E. Miller, Esq., and Patricia L.
Stasco, Esq., Arnold & Porter, for BAE Systems Information Technology LLC;
Anne B. Perry, Esq., John W. Chierichella, Esq., Jonathan S. Aronie, Esq.,
Marko Kipa, Esq., Louis D. Victorino, Esq., and Keith R. Szeliga, Esq.,
Sheppard Mullin, for Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc.; Karen
R. Harbaugh, Esq., Robert E. Gregg, Esq., and Steven Tibbets, Esq.,
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, for Pragmatics, Inc., the protesters.
Carl J. Peckinpaugh, Esq., and Helaine G. Elderkin, Esq., Computer
Sciences Corporation; Richard J. Webber, Esq., Lisa K. Miller, Esq., and
Craig S. King, Esq., Arent Fox, for CACI-ISS, Inc.; Richard O. Duvall,
Esq., David S. Black, Esq., Eric L. Yeo, Esq., and Caitlin K. Cloonan,
Esq., Holland & Knight, for Booz Allen Hamilton; Alexander J. Brittin,
Esq., and Margaret A. Dillenburg, Esq., for Science Applications
International Corporation; Gerald H. Werfel, Esq., Pompan, Murray &
Werfel, for STG, Inc.; Richard J. Conway, Esq., David M. Adler, Esq., and
Joseph R. Berger, Esq., Dickstein Shapiro, for Apptis, Inc.; and Grant H.
Willis, Esq., and Peter F. Garvin, III, Esq., Jones Day, for Electronic
Data Systems, the intervenors.
Raymond M. Saunders, Esq., Karl M. Ellcessor, Esq., and Lt. Col. Frank A.
March, Department of the Army, for the agency.
David A. Ashen, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
Where agency identified certain proposed hourly labor rates as
significantly higher than independent government cost estimate (IGCE)
labor rates, offerors reasonably deduced--incorrectly, as record
shows--that rates not identified were not significantly higher than IGCE
rates, which led offerors to leave those rates unchanged in their final
proposal revisions; discussions therefore were misleading and protest is
sustained on that basis.
DECISION
Multimax, Inc., NCI Information Systems, Inc., BAE Systems Information
Technology LLC, Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc. (NGI), and
Pragmatics, Inc. protest the Department of the Army*s award of 11
contracts to other offerors, under request for proposals (RFP) No.
W91QUZ-05-R-0004, under the agency*s Information Technology Enterprise
Solutions-2 Services (ITES-2S) procurement for information technology (IT)
services.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...