B-298494.2; B-298494.3; B-298494.4; B-298494.5; B-298494.6; B-298494.7; B-298494.8; B-298494.9; B-298494.10; B-298494.11; B-298494.12; B-298494.13; B-298494.14, Computer Sciences Corporation; Unisys Corporation; Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc.; IBM Business Consulting Services--Federal, May 10, 2007
Case: B-298494.2
Agency:
Protester: B
Date: 2007-05-10
Sustained
B-298494.2; B-298494.3; B-298494.4; B-298494.5; B-298494.6; B-298494.7; B-298494.8; B-298494.9; B-298494.10; B-298494.11; B-298494.12; B-298494.13; B-298494.14, Computer Sciences Corporation; Unisys Corporation; Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc.; IBM Business Consulting Services--Federal, May 10, 2007
TITLE: B-298494.2; B-298494.3; B-298494.4; B-298494.5; B-298494.6; B-298494.7; B-298494.8; B-298494.9; B-298494.10; B-298494.11; B-298494.12; B-298494.13; B-298494.14, Computer Sciences Corporation; Unisys Corporation; Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc.; IBM Business Consulting Services--Federal, May 10, 2007
BNUMBER: B-298494.2; B-298494.3; B-298494.4; B-298494.5; B-298494.6; B-298494.7; B-298494.8; B-298494.9; B-298494.10; B-298494.11; B-298494.12; B-298494.13; B-298494.14
DATE: May 10, 2007
**********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
B-298494.2; B-298494.3; B-298494.4; B-298494.5; B-298494.6; B-298494.7; B-298494.8; B-298494.9; B-298494.10; B-298494.11; B-298494.12; B-298494.13; B-298494.14, Computer Sciences Corporation; Unisys Corporation; Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc.; IBM Business Consulting Services--Federal, May 10, 2007
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective
Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release.
Decision
Matter of: Computer Sciences Corporation; Unisys Corporation; Northrop
Grumman Information Technology, Inc.; IBM Business Consulting
Services--Federal
File: B-298494.2; B-298494.3; B-298494.4; B-298494.5; B-298494.6;
B-298494.7; B-298494.8; B-298494.9; B-298494.10; B-298494.11;
B-298494.12; B-298494.13; B-298494.14
Date: May 10, 2007
Carl J. Peckinpaugh, Esq., and Helaine G. Elderkin, Esq., for Computer
Sciences Corporation; David S. Cohen, Esq., John J. O'Brien, Esq., Laurel
A. Hockey, Esq., Bryan T. Bunting, Esq., Catherine K. Kroll, Esq., and
Tenley A. Carp, Esq., Cohen Mohr LLP, and E. Charles Rowan, Jr., Esq., and
Charlotte D. Young, Esq., for Unisys Corporation; William W. Thompson,
Jr., Esq., Michael A. Branca, Esq., Lori Ann Lange, Esq., and Diane Foose,
Esq., Peckar, Abramson, Bastianelli & Kelley, LLP, and Linda T. Maramba,
Esq., for Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc.; John S. Pachter,
Esq., Jonathan D. Shaffer, Esq., Mary Pat Gregory, Esq., and Matthew L.
Haws, Esq., Smith Pachter McWhorter PLC, and Todd Hutchen, Esq., for IBM
Business Consulting Services--Federal, the protesters.
Thomas P. Barletta, Esq., Daniel C. Sauls, Esq., Paul R. Hurst, Esq.,
Michael J. Navarre, Esq., and Ana Holmes Voss, Esq., Steptoe & Johnson
LLP, and James S. Kennell, Esq., for Science Applications International
Corporation; Lori A. Conlon, Esq., for Lockheed Martin Information
Services, Inc.; Kevin P. Mullen, Esq., David E. Fletcher, Esq., and Tara
M. Lee, Esq., Cooley Godward Kronish LLP, for Electronic Data Systems
Corp.; Thomas O. Mason, Esq., Frances E. Purcell, Jr., Esq., Robert E.
Korroch, Esq., and Megan E. Burns, Esq., Williams Mullen, for Booz Allen
Hamilton Inc.; and Gregory S. Jacobs, Esq., Reed Smith LLP, for CACI,
Inc.--Federal, the intervenors.
Robert R. Goff, Esq., Defense Information Systems Agency, for the agency.
Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
In a negotiated procurement, an agency's exchanges with offerors with
respect to their proposed subcontracting plans were discussions, where the
solicitation provided for the comparative assessment of the merits of the
plans as part of the agency's technical evaluation, a number of the
offerors' subcontracting plans were assessed as being unacceptable, and
the offerors made material revisions in their plans in response to the
exchanges with the agency that made them acceptable.
DECISION
Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC); Unisys Corporation; Northrop Grumman
Information Technology, Inc. (NGIT); and IBM Business Consulting
Services--Federal protest the failure of the Defense Information Systems
Agency (DISA), Department of Defense (DoD), to award "Encore II" contracts
to the protesters under request for proposals (RFP) No. HC1013-05-R-2003
for information technology services supporting DoD and other federal
agencies.
Full decision text continues on ProtestIntel...